INXDF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
50.52M
MARK
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
18.4M
Ad is loading...

INXDF vs MARK

Header iconINXDF vs MARK Comparison
Open Charts INXDF vs MARKBanner chart's image
The INX Digital
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.74K
Capitalization50.52M
Remark Holdings
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$154.17K
Capitalization18.4M
INXDF vs MARK Comparison Chart
Loading...
MARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INXDF vs. MARK commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INXDF is a Hold and MARK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (INXDF: $0.05 vs. MARK: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: INXDF and MARK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INXDF: 4% vs. MARK: 166%
Market capitalization -- INXDF: $50.52M vs. MARK: $18.4M
INXDF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $50.52M. MARK’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $18.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INXDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMARK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • INXDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MARK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, INXDF is a better buy in the long-term than MARK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MARK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MARK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

INXDF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -21.14% price change this week, while MARK (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

MARK is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.10% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INXDF($50.5M) has a higher market cap than MARK($18.4M). MARK has higher P/E ratio than INXDF: MARK (5.95) vs INXDF (0.60). MARK YTD gains are higher at: -28.736 vs. INXDF (-34.090). INXDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 96.3M vs. MARK (-26.9M). INXDF has more cash in the bank: 40.9M vs. MARK (208K). INXDF has less debt than MARK: INXDF (1.25M) vs MARK (17.3M). MARK has higher revenues than INXDF: MARK (8.43M) vs INXDF (4.35M).
INXDFMARKINXDF / MARK
Capitalization50.5M18.4M274%
EBITDA96.3M-26.9M-358%
Gain YTD-34.090-28.736119%
P/E Ratio0.605.9510%
Revenue4.35M8.43M52%
Total Cash40.9M208K19,663%
Total Debt1.25M17.3M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MARK: Fundamental Ratings
MARK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
52
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MARK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96258.000000-319.757800
-0.33%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

INXDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INXDF and MARK have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INXDF and MARK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INXDF
1D Price
Change %
INXDF100%
+3.61%
MARK - INXDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
IMXI - INXDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
SSTI - INXDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.43%
ACON - INXDF
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.04%
NEOJF - INXDF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MARK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MARK has been loosely correlated with BMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MARK jumps, then BMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MARK
1D Price
Change %
MARK100%
+1.64%
BMR - MARK
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.65%
IMMR - MARK
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
ATCH - MARK
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
SANG - MARK
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
INXDF - MARK
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.61%
More