Advertisement
INVH vs KMMPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INVH is a Hold and KMMPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INVH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKMMPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- INVH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- KMMPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INVH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMMPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INVH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KMMPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
INVH (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -3.32% price change this week, while KMMPF (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +3.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
INVH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (-0.20% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| INVH | KMMPF | INVH / KMMPF | |
| Capitalization | 18.5B | 1.61B | 1,152% |
| EBITDA | 1.64B | 331M | 494% |
| Gain YTD | -3.728 | 13.155 | -28% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.99 | 3.93 | 866% |
| Revenue | 2.68B | 375M | 713% |
| Total Cash | 65.1M | 10.8M | 603% |
| Total Debt | 8.18B | 2.21B | 370% |
INVH | KMMPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KMMPF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INVH (92) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that KMMPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than INVH’s over the last 12 months.
INVH's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KMMPF (100) in the null industry. This means that INVH’s stock grew similarly to KMMPF’s over the last 12 months.
KMMPF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INVH (84) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that KMMPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than INVH’s over the last 12 months.
KMMPF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as INVH (62) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that KMMPF’s stock grew similarly to INVH’s over the last 12 months.
INVH's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KMMPF (94) in the null industry. This means that INVH’s stock grew similarly to KMMPF’s over the last 12 months.
| INVH | KMMPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 26% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 34% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 40% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 38% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 36% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 27% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
INVH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INVH has been closely correlated with AMH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INVH jumps, then AMH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INVH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INVH | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| AMH - INVH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| UDR - INVH | 77% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| EQR - INVH | 77% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| ESS - INVH | 74% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| CPT - INVH | 74% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
More | ||||
KMMPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KMMPF and KLPEF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMMPF and KLPEF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KMMPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMMPF | 100% | +1.22% | ||
| KLPEF - KMMPF | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.51% | ||
| BYLOF - KMMPF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| INVH - KMMPF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
| MAA - KMMPF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| REXR - KMMPF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
More | ||||