INV
Price
$4.72
Change
-$0.08 (-1.67%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
253.74M
MSDL
Price
$17.67
Change
-$0.21 (-1.17%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.54B
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

INV vs MSDL

Header iconINV vs MSDL Comparison
Open Charts INV vs MSDLBanner chart's image
Innventure
Price$4.72
Change-$0.08 (-1.67%)
Volume$64.69K
Capitalization253.74M
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund
Price$17.67
Change-$0.21 (-1.17%)
Volume$4.02K
Capitalization1.54B
INV vs MSDL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
INV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INV vs. MSDL commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INV is a Buy and MSDL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (INV: $4.72 vs. MSDL: $17.70)
Brand notoriety: INV and MSDL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INV: 23% vs. MSDL: 371%
Market capitalization -- INV: $253.74M vs. MSDL: $1.54B
INV [@Investment Managers] is valued at $253.74M. MSDL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $174.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMSDL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • INV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MSDL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSDL is a better buy in the long-term than INV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSDL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSDL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSDL is a better buy in the short-term than INV.

Price Growth

INV (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.65% price change this week, while MSDL (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSDL is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+3.70% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSDL($1.54B) has a higher market cap than INV($254M). MSDL YTD gains are higher at: -8.942 vs. INV (-65.921). MSDL has more cash in the bank: 64.8M vs. INV (1.38M). INV has less debt than MSDL: INV (14.5M) vs MSDL (2.01B).
INVMSDLINV / MSDL
Capitalization254M1.54B17%
EBITDA-332.69MN/A-
Gain YTD-65.921-8.942737%
P/E RatioN/A9.17-
Revenue1.22MN/A-
Total Cash1.38M64.8M2%
Total Debt14.5M2.01B1%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INVMSDL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOSAF1.01N/A
N/A
SoSTravel.com S.p.A
AELTF1.10N/A
N/A
Adacel Technologies Ltd.
KBCSF105.70N/A
N/A
KBC Group SA
MPZAF44.60N/A
N/A
Mips Ab
PSBAF0.13N/A
N/A
PT Sumber Alfaria Trijaya TBK

INV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INV and CG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INV and CG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INV
1D Price
Change %
INV100%
-1.67%
CG - INV
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
TPG - INV
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
MAAS - INV
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
RMCO - INV
4%
Poorly correlated
+12.04%
MSDL - INV
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
More

MSDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSDL has been loosely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSDL jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSDL
1D Price
Change %
MSDL100%
-1.54%
OBDC - MSDL
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
CSWC - MSDL
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
BCSF - MSDL
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
GLAD - MSDL
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
MFIC - MSDL
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
More