Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
INUTX vs RMEBX
INUTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts INUTX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Opportunity A
Price$40.53
Change+$0.20 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.21B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.72
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
INUTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
INUTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INUTX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. INUTX (2.21B). INUTX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: INUTX (2.41) vs RMEBX (1.03). INUTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: INUTX (37 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and INUTX (1.03) have similar cost to investors . INUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than INUTX: RMEBX (250) vs INUTX (2000). INUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.40 vs. RMEBX (7.97). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.21 vs. INUTX (36.49).
| INUTX | RMEBX | INUTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.337 | 9.599 | 108% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 1.03 | 235% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.40 | 7.97 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.80 | 28.41 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.49 | 45.21 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.80 | 90.05 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement