Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
INUTX vs RMEBX
INUTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts INUTX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Opportunity A
Price$38.62
Change-$0.33 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.09B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
INUTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
INUTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INUTX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. INUTX (2.09B). INUTX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: INUTX (2.61) vs RMEBX (1.16). INUTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: INUTX (37 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). INUTX (1.07) and RMEBX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . INUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than INUTX: RMEBX (250) vs INUTX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. INUTX (7.12). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. INUTX (43.41).
| INUTX | RMEBX | INUTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.704 | 5.923 | 63% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 106B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 1.16 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.12 | 8.54 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.66 | 27.89 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.41 | 58.69 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.50 | 68.22 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement