Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
INUTX vs RMEBX
INUTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts INUTX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Opportunity A
Price$40.72
Change-$0.06 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
INUTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
INUTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INUTX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. INUTX (2.17B). INUTX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: INUTX (2.49) vs RMEBX (1.09). INUTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: INUTX (37 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). INUTX (1.07) and RMEBX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . INUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than INUTX: RMEBX (250) vs INUTX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. INUTX (6.39). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. INUTX (43.95).
| INUTX | RMEBX | INUTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.156 | 11.308 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 1.09 | 228% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.39 | 7.57 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.30 | 31.59 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.95 | 55.29 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.69 | 89.40 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement