It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INTU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSQNXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INTU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQNXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
INTU (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.87% price change this week, while SQNXF (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.77%.
INTU is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Electronics/Appliances (-2.44% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
INTU | SQNXF | INTU / SQNXF | |
Capitalization | 188B | 8.13B | 2,311% |
EBITDA | 5.39B | 18.8B | 29% |
Gain YTD | 7.562 | 63.697 | 12% |
P/E Ratio | 49.22 | 48.60 | 101% |
Revenue | 18.2B | 342B | 5% |
Total Cash | 6.17B | 222B | 3% |
Total Debt | 7.09B | N/A | - |
INTU | SQNXF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INTU's Valuation (24) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SQNXF (89) in the null industry. This means that INTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than SQNXF’s over the last 12 months.
INTU's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SQNXF (76) in the null industry. This means that INTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than SQNXF’s over the last 12 months.
SQNXF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTU (50) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SQNXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTU’s over the last 12 months.
SQNXF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as INTU (62) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SQNXF’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.
SQNXF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTU (74) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SQNXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTU’s over the last 12 months.
INTU | SQNXF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago57% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago49% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago53% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago70% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago62% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago48% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FORTH.X | 2.766617 | 0.055071 | +2.03% |
Ampleforth Governance Token cryptocurrency | |||
SXP.X | 0.170923 | 0.003075 | +1.83% |
Solar cryptocurrency | |||
RUNE.X | 1.192244 | 0.015943 | +1.36% |
THORChain cryptocurrency | |||
LTO.X | 0.008230 | 0.000076 | +0.94% |
LTO Network cryptocurrency | |||
IDCC | 287.80 | -0.08 | -0.03% |
InterDigital |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTU has been loosely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTU jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INTU | 100% | +0.68% | ||
CRM - INTU | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.77% | ||
PANW - INTU | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
ADSK - INTU | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
NOW - INTU | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
SNOW - INTU | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SQNXF and FREKF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SQNXF and FREKF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQNXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SQNXF | 100% | N/A | ||
FREKF - SQNXF | 24% Poorly correlated | +7.88% | ||
XPER - SQNXF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.83% | ||
WDAY - SQNXF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
INTU - SQNXF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
YEXT - SQNXF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
More |