It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INTU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOKTA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INTU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OKTA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
INTU (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.95% price change this week, while OKTA (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.
INTU is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
OKTA is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
INTU | OKTA | INTU / OKTA | |
Capitalization | 179B | 17.3B | 1,035% |
EBITDA | 4.37B | -245M | -1,784% |
Gain YTD | 12.786 | -15.023 | -85% |
P/E Ratio | 65.35 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 15.1B | 2.26B | 667% |
Total Cash | 1.49B | 2.2B | 68% |
Total Debt | 6.5B | 1.3B | 501% |
INTU | OKTA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OKTA's Valuation (48) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as INTU (74). This means that OKTA’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.
INTU's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for OKTA (100). This means that INTU’s stock grew significantly faster than OKTA’s over the last 12 months.
INTU's SMR Rating (54) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OKTA (92). This means that INTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than OKTA’s over the last 12 months.
INTU's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OKTA (61). This means that INTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than OKTA’s over the last 12 months.
INTU's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OKTA (100). This means that INTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than OKTA’s over the last 12 months.
INTU | OKTA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 9 days ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTU has been loosely correlated with ADSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTU jumps, then ADSK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INTU | 100% | -0.78% | ||
ADSK - INTU | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.07% | ||
GTLB - INTU | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
ADBE - INTU | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
DAY - INTU | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
CRM - INTU | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OKTA has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OKTA jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OKTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OKTA | 100% | -1.90% | ||
PATH - OKTA | 45% Loosely correlated | -6.58% | ||
AI - OKTA | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
CRM - OKTA | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
IOT - OKTA | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.69% | ||
DUOL - OKTA | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
More |