INTA
Price
$56.92
Change
-$0.82 (-1.42%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
88 days until earnings call
SMSZF
Price
$17.86
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 25 closing price
Ad is loading...

INTA vs SMSZF

Header iconINTA vs SMSZF Comparison
Open Charts INTA vs SMSZFBanner chart's image
Intapp
Price$56.92
Change-$0.82 (-1.42%)
Volume$700.6K
CapitalizationN/A
SMS
Price$17.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
INTA vs SMSZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
INTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INTA vs. SMSZF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INTA is a Hold and SMSZF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (INTA: $56.92 vs. SMSZF: $17.86)
Brand notoriety: INTA and SMSZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INTA: 109% vs. SMSZF: 100%
Market capitalization -- INTA: $2.5B vs. SMSZF: $1.86B
INTA [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.5B. SMSZF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INTA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMSZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • INTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMSZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both INTA and SMSZF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INTA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • INTA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

INTA (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.56% price change this week, while SMSZF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

INTA is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INTA($2.5B) has a higher market cap than SMSZF($1.86B). INTA YTD gains are higher at: 49.711 vs. SMSZF (-29.961). SMSZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.02B vs. INTA (-37.76M). SMSZF has more cash in the bank: 17.4B vs. INTA (166M). INTA has less debt than SMSZF: INTA (14.7M) vs SMSZF (9.33B). SMSZF has higher revenues than INTA: SMSZF (44B) vs INTA (392M).
INTASMSZFINTA / SMSZF
Capitalization2.5B1.86B135%
EBITDA-37.76M9.02B-0%
Gain YTD49.711-29.961-166%
P/E RatioN/A56.18-
Revenue392M44B1%
Total Cash166M17.4B1%
Total Debt14.7M9.33B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INTA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
INTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

INTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTA has been loosely correlated with PLUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTA jumps, then PLUS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTA
1D Price
Change %
INTA100%
-1.42%
PLUS - INTA
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
MLNK - INTA
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.58%
WK - INTA
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
DJCO - INTA
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
EVCM - INTA
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
More

SMSZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMSZF has been loosely correlated with MLNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMSZF jumps, then MLNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMSZF
1D Price
Change %
SMSZF100%
N/A
MLNK - SMSZF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.58%
PLUS - SMSZF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
INTA - SMSZF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
SBIG - SMSZF
25%
Poorly correlated
-50.62%
SGGEF - SMSZF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More