Advertisement
INRO vs QCOM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INRO is a Buy and QCOM is a Hold.
QCOM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| INRO | QCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 61% | 8 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TUG | 40.63 | -0.04 | -0.09% |
| STF Tactical Growth ETF | |||
| LQD | 111.10 | -0.11 | -0.10% |
| iShares iBoxx $ Invmt Grade Corp Bd ETF | |||
| VPV | 10.76 | -0.03 | -0.28% |
| Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust | |||
| MSOS | 4.32 | -0.13 | -2.92% |
| AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF | |||
| LCDL | 8.73 | -0.47 | -5.11% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long LCID Daily ETF | |||
INRO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INRO has been closely correlated with QCOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INRO jumps, then QCOM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INRO | 100% | -1.80% | ||
| QCOM - INRO | 75% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| ENTG - INRO | 73% Closely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| KLAC - INRO | 73% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| SNPS - INRO | 72% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| LRCX - INRO | 72% Closely correlated | -5.02% | ||
More | ||||
QCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 100% | +1.55% | ||
| LRCX - QCOM | 80% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| KLAC - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| AMKR - QCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| NXPI - QCOM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| ADI - QCOM | 75% Closely correlated | +3.44% | ||
More | ||||