INRLF
Price
$2.89
Change
-$0.21 (-6.77%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
539.24M
ISCO
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.05 (-25.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.21M
Interact to see
Advertisement

INRLF vs ISCO

Header iconINRLF vs ISCO Comparison
Open Charts INRLF vs ISCOBanner chart's image
Valneva SE
Price$2.89
Change-$0.21 (-6.77%)
Volume$150
Capitalization539.24M
International Stem Cell
Price$0.15
Change-$0.05 (-25.00%)
Volume$16.39K
Capitalization1.21M
INRLF vs ISCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
INRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ISCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INRLF vs. ISCO commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INRLF is a Hold and ISCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (INRLF: $2.89 vs. ISCO: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: INRLF and ISCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INRLF: 14% vs. ISCO: 205%
Market capitalization -- INRLF: $539.24M vs. ISCO: $1.21M
INRLF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $539.24M. ISCO’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $1.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $286.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INRLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileISCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • INRLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ISCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ISCO is a better buy in the long-term than INRLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INRLF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ISCO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INRLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ISCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ISCO is a better buy in the short-term than INRLF.

Price Growth

INRLF (@Biotechnology) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ISCO (@Biotechnology) price change was +25.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+2.21% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INRLF($539M) has a higher market cap than ISCO($1.21M). ISCO YTD gains are higher at: 85.732 vs. INRLF (38.278). ISCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 111K vs. INRLF (-55.24M). INRLF has more cash in the bank: 153M vs. ISCO (1.45M). ISCO has less debt than INRLF: ISCO (4.1M) vs INRLF (211M). INRLF has higher revenues than ISCO: INRLF (186M) vs ISCO (9.09M).
INRLFISCOINRLF / ISCO
Capitalization539M1.21M44,582%
EBITDA-55.24M111K-49,769%
Gain YTD38.27885.73245%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue186M9.09M2,047%
Total Cash153M1.45M10,537%
Total Debt211M4.1M5,153%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INRLF vs ISCO: Fundamental Ratings
INRLF
ISCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5638
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7589
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ISCO's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INRLF (48). This means that ISCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than INRLF’s over the last 12 months.

ISCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as INRLF (100). This means that ISCO’s stock grew similarly to INRLF’s over the last 12 months.

INRLF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as ISCO (100). This means that INRLF’s stock grew similarly to ISCO’s over the last 12 months.

ISCO's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as INRLF (56). This means that ISCO’s stock grew similarly to INRLF’s over the last 12 months.

INRLF's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as ISCO (89). This means that INRLF’s stock grew similarly to ISCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INRLFISCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ISCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPHA1.920.15
+8.45%
Innate Pharma SA
PEG84.311.56
+1.89%
Public Service Enterprise Group
GLOB84.34-0.83
-0.97%
Globant SA
IRS14.72-0.20
-1.34%
IRSA Inversiones Y Representaciones S.A
SONN6.18-1.61
-20.67%
Sonnet BioTherapeutics Holdings Inc

INRLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INRLF and BRTX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INRLF and BRTX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INRLF
1D Price
Change %
INRLF100%
N/A
BRTX - INRLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
SBMFF - INRLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.01%
ONCY - INRLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.79%
XFOR - INRLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.03%
ISCO - INRLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-23.74%
More

ISCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ISCO and XBIT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISCO and XBIT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISCO
1D Price
Change %
ISCO100%
-23.74%
XBIT - ISCO
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
INDP - ISCO
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
CORT - ISCO
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.06%
BLTE - ISCO
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
IVBXF - ISCO
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
More