Advertisement
INOQ vs SRNW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INOQ is a Hold and SRNW is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INOQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRNW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- INOQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SRNW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
INOQ (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SRNW (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -6.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.96%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.23% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| INOQ | SRNW | INOQ / SRNW | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 16M | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | -2.1M | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -8.501 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 0 | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 1.58M | - |
INOQ | SRNW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 37 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INOQ's Valuation (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRNW (100). This means that INOQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRNW’s over the last 12 months.
SRNW's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as INOQ (100). This means that SRNW’s stock grew similarly to INOQ’s over the last 12 months.
SRNW's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as INOQ (100). This means that SRNW’s stock grew similarly to INOQ’s over the last 12 months.
INOQ's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SRNW (61). This means that INOQ’s stock grew similarly to SRNW’s over the last 12 months.
INOQ's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SRNW (100). This means that INOQ’s stock grew similarly to SRNW’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DYDX.X | 0.519276 | 0.003737 | +0.72% |
| dYdX cryptocurrency | |||
| PQDI | 19.14 | -0.01 | -0.08% |
| Principal Spectrum Tax-Adv Dvd Actv ETF | |||
| EMHC | 24.20 | -0.12 | -0.49% |
| SPDR® Bloomberg EM USD Bd ETF | |||
| QLTA | 47.14 | -0.24 | -0.51% |
| iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| FDMO | 72.42 | -0.84 | -1.14% |
| Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF | |||
INOQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that INOQ and ADCV have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INOQ and ADCV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INOQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INOQ | 100% | N/A | ||
| ADCV - INOQ | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MAYX - INOQ | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TFGL - INOQ | -0% Poorly correlated | -60.63% | ||
| SRNW - INOQ | -2% Poorly correlated | -3.79% |
SRNW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SRNW and AIMUF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRNW and AIMUF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SRNW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRNW | 100% | -3.79% | ||
| AIMUF - SRNW | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PLTYF - SRNW | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MAYX - SRNW | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TFGL - SRNW | 1% Poorly correlated | -60.63% | ||
| ADCV - SRNW | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||