It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXFOR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XFOR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
INM (@Biotechnology) experienced а +2059.86% price change this week, while XFOR (@Biotechnology) price change was -33.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.23%.
INM is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2024.
XFOR is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
INM | XFOR | INM / XFOR | |
Capitalization | 73M | 69.1M | 106% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 1121.154 | -51.103 | -2,194% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 3.15 | - |
Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 134K | 26.3M | 1% |
Total Debt | 1.07M | 58.3M | 2% |
INM | XFOR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 97 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
XFOR's Valuation (52) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as INM (67) in the null industry. This means that XFOR’s stock grew similarly to INM’s over the last 12 months.
XFOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as INM (100) in the null industry. This means that XFOR’s stock grew similarly to INM’s over the last 12 months.
INM's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as XFOR (99) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that INM’s stock grew similarly to XFOR’s over the last 12 months.
INM's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XFOR (97) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that INM’s stock grew somewhat faster than XFOR’s over the last 12 months.
INM's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as XFOR (90) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that INM’s stock grew similarly to XFOR’s over the last 12 months.
INM | XFOR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 5 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INM has been loosely correlated with OMER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INM jumps, then OMER could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INM | 100% | +2085.89% | ||
OMER - INM | 46% Loosely correlated | +65.87% | ||
TTNP - INM | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.86% | ||
SPHDF - INM | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
XFOR - INM | 32% Poorly correlated | +47.85% | ||
MTEM - INM | 31% Poorly correlated | +89.38% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XFOR has been loosely correlated with SYRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XFOR jumps, then SYRS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XFOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
XFOR | 100% | +47.85% | ||
SYRS - XFOR | 50% Loosely correlated | -23.37% | ||
KROS - XFOR | 39% Loosely correlated | -4.31% | ||
IMMP - XFOR | 36% Loosely correlated | +11.76% | ||
HOFBF - XFOR | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
ABSI - XFOR | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.98% | ||
More |