INGVF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
77.35B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NAUBF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
84.28B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

INGVF vs NAUBF

Header iconINGVF vs NAUBF Comparison
Open Charts INGVF vs NAUBFBanner chart's image
ING Groep
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$600
Capitalization77.35B
National Australia Bank Ltd. (Victoria, Australia)
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
Capitalization84.28B
INGVF vs NAUBF Comparison Chart in %
INGVF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NAUBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INGVF vs. NAUBF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INGVF is a Buy and NAUBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (INGVF: $25.35 vs. NAUBF: $26.50)
Brand notoriety: INGVF and NAUBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INGVF: 44% vs. NAUBF: 85%
Market capitalization -- INGVF: $77.35B vs. NAUBF: $84.28B
INGVF [@Major Banks] is valued at $77.35B. NAUBF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $84.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $842.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $141.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INGVF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNAUBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • INGVF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NAUBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, INGVF is a better buy in the long-term than NAUBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INGVF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAUBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INGVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NAUBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both INGVF and NAUBF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

INGVF (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NAUBF (@Major Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.18% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAUBF($84.3B) has a higher market cap than INGVF($77.4B). NAUBF has higher P/E ratio than INGVF: NAUBF (18.36) vs INGVF (10.93). INGVF YTD gains are higher at: 66.750 vs. NAUBF (15.117). INGVF has less debt than NAUBF: INGVF (168B) vs NAUBF (212B). INGVF has higher revenues than NAUBF: INGVF (22.6B) vs NAUBF (20.7B).
INGVFNAUBFINGVF / NAUBF
Capitalization77.4B84.3B92%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD66.75015.117442%
P/E Ratio10.9318.3660%
Revenue22.6B20.7B109%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt168B212B79%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INGVF vs NAUBF: Fundamental Ratings
INGVF
NAUBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3795
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2030
SMR RATING
1..100
44
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1234
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

INGVF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (77). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (30). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (4). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (51). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (34). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGVFNAUBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INGVF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NAUBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBLK18.78-0.01
-0.05%
Star Bulk Carriers Corp
BBIO66.22-0.36
-0.54%
BridgeBio Pharma
GAUZ4.35-0.10
-2.25%
Gauzy Ltd
PTIX1.92-0.09
-4.48%
Protagenic Therapeutics Inc
BBBY6.76-0.38
-5.32%
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc

INGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INGVF and RY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INGVF and RY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INGVF
1D Price
Change %
INGVF100%
N/A
RY - INGVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
ANZGF - INGVF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ING - INGVF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
BNS - INGVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
BMO - INGVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
More

NAUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAUBF and FANDF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAUBF and FANDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAUBF
1D Price
Change %
NAUBF100%
N/A
FANDF - NAUBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBFJF - NAUBF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
SCBFF - NAUBF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
IDCBY - NAUBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
INGVF - NAUBF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More