INGVF
Price
$21.53
Change
+$1.28 (+6.32%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
52.71B
NAUBF
Price
$24.53
Change
-$1.47 (-5.65%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
59.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

INGVF vs NAUBF

Header iconINGVF vs NAUBF Comparison
Open Charts INGVF vs NAUBFBanner chart's image
ING Groep
Price$21.53
Change+$1.28 (+6.32%)
Volume$1.51K
Capitalization52.71B
National Australia Bank Ltd. (Victoria, Australia)
Price$24.53
Change-$1.47 (-5.65%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization59.59B
INGVF vs NAUBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
INGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INGVF vs. NAUBF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INGVF is a StrongBuy and NAUBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (INGVF: $21.53 vs. NAUBF: $24.53)
Brand notoriety: INGVF and NAUBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INGVF: 74% vs. NAUBF: 232%
Market capitalization -- INGVF: $52.71B vs. NAUBF: $59.59B
INGVF [@Major Banks] is valued at $52.71B. NAUBF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $59.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INGVF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNAUBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • INGVF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NAUBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, INGVF is a better buy in the long-term than NAUBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INGVF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAUBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INGVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NAUBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INGVF is a better buy in the short-term than NAUBF.

Price Growth

INGVF (@Major Banks) experienced а +6.34% price change this week, while NAUBF (@Major Banks) price change was -4.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.55% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAUBF($59.6B) has a higher market cap than INGVF($52.7B). NAUBF has higher P/E ratio than INGVF: NAUBF (12.52) vs INGVF (9.91). INGVF YTD gains are higher at: 41.645 vs. NAUBF (6.560). INGVF has less debt than NAUBF: INGVF (125B) vs NAUBF (139B). NAUBF (19.9B) and INGVF (19.6B) have equivalent revenues.
INGVFNAUBFINGVF / NAUBF
Capitalization52.7B59.6B88%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD41.6456.560635%
P/E Ratio9.9112.5279%
Revenue19.6B19.9B98%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt125B139B90%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INGVF vs NAUBF: Fundamental Ratings
INGVF
NAUBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2124
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2953
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

INGVF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAUBF (91). This means that INGVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (24). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (3). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (43). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (53). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGVFNAUBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNAL1.570.05
+3.19%
Snail
PANW201.824.85
+2.46%
Palo Alto Networks Inc
SGMT8.250.14
+1.73%
Sagimet Biosciences
ELME16.160.11
+0.69%
Elme Communities
NXST181.271.01
+0.56%
Nexstar Media Group

INGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INGVF and ANZGF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INGVF and ANZGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INGVF
1D Price
Change %
INGVF100%
N/A
ANZGF - INGVF
31%
Poorly correlated
+12.99%
ANZGY - INGVF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.00%
NABZY - INGVF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
MBFJF - INGVF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NAUBF - INGVF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
More

NAUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAUBF and BBVXF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAUBF and BBVXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAUBF
1D Price
Change %
NAUBF100%
-5.65%
BBVXF - NAUBF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
RBSPF - NAUBF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
INGVF - NAUBF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBFJF - NAUBF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCBFF - NAUBF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
More