INGR
Price
$125.81
Change
-$0.43 (-0.34%)
Updated
Aug 11, 03:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.12B
85 days until earnings call
TBLMF
Price
$18.00
Change
+$3.02 (+20.16%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.67B
Interact to see
Advertisement

INGR vs TBLMF

Header iconINGR vs TBLMF Comparison
Open Charts INGR vs TBLMFBanner chart's image
Ingredion
Price$125.81
Change-$0.43 (-0.34%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.12B
Tiger Brands
Price$18.00
Change+$3.02 (+20.16%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.67B
INGR vs TBLMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
INGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INGR vs. TBLMF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INGR is a Hold and TBLMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (INGR: $126.24 vs. TBLMF: $18.00)
Brand notoriety: INGR and TBLMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INGR: 76% vs. TBLMF: 100%
Market capitalization -- INGR: $8.12B vs. TBLMF: $2.67B
INGR [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $8.12B. TBLMF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $2.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INGR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBLMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • INGR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TBLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TBLMF is a better buy in the long-term than INGR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INGR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBLMF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INGR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TBLMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TBLMF is a better buy in the short-term than INGR.

Price Growth

INGR (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -4.03% price change this week, while TBLMF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +834.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

INGR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.81% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INGR($8.12B) has a higher market cap than TBLMF($2.67B). TBLMF (12.79) and INGR (12.33) have similar P/E ratio . TBLMF YTD gains are higher at: 13.493 vs. INGR (-6.592). TBLMF has less debt than INGR: TBLMF (828M) vs INGR (1.78B).
INGRTBLMFINGR / TBLMF
Capitalization8.12B2.67B304%
EBITDAN/A5.91B-
Gain YTD-6.59213.493-49%
P/E Ratio12.3312.7996%
RevenueN/A38B-
Total CashN/A6.46B-
Total Debt1.78B828M215%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INGR vs TBLMF: Fundamental Ratings
INGR
TBLMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2349
SMR RATING
1..100
5388
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5746
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TBLMF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as INGR (35) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that TBLMF’s stock grew similarly to INGR’s over the last 12 months.

INGR's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as TBLMF (49) in the null industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to TBLMF’s over the last 12 months.

INGR's SMR Rating (53) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TBLMF (88) in the null industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew somewhat faster than TBLMF’s over the last 12 months.

TBLMF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as INGR (61) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that TBLMF’s stock grew similarly to INGR’s over the last 12 months.

TBLMF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as INGR (57) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that TBLMF’s stock grew similarly to INGR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGRTBLMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
49%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
41%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QIS20.780.64
+3.16%
Simplify Multi-QIS Alternative ETF
HAWX35.980.18
+0.50%
iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI ACWI exUS ETF
FHDG32.320.08
+0.24%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Qt Dyn Buffr ETF
KNOW11.05N/A
N/A
Fundamentals First ETF
IMCB80.23-0.11
-0.14%
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF

INGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INGR has been loosely correlated with MKC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INGR jumps, then MKC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INGR
1D Price
Change %
INGR100%
-0.02%
MKC - INGR
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
POST - INGR
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.92%
FLO - INGR
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
GIS - INGR
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
KHC - INGR
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
More

TBLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TBLMF has been loosely correlated with HNFSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TBLMF jumps, then HNFSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBLMF
1D Price
Change %
TBLMF100%
N/A
HNFSA - TBLMF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
INGR - TBLMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
TSUKY - TBLMF
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.87%
UVRBF - TBLMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UELKY - TBLMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More