INGR
Price
$133.14
Change
-$1.40 (-1.04%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
7.69B
12 days until earnings call
LW
Price
$49.00
Change
-$1.49 (-2.95%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
15.38B
3 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

INGR vs LW

Header iconINGR vs LW Comparison
Open Charts INGR vs LWBanner chart's image
Ingredion
Price$133.14
Change-$1.40 (-1.04%)
Volume$487.15K
Capitalization7.69B
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$49.00
Change-$1.49 (-2.95%)
Volume$2.58M
Capitalization15.38B
INGR vs LW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
INGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INGR vs. LW commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INGR is a Hold and LW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (INGR: $133.14 vs. LW: $49.00)
Brand notoriety: INGR and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INGR: 109% vs. LW: 133%
Market capitalization -- INGR: $7.69B vs. LW: $15.38B
INGR [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $7.69B. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $15.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INGR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • INGR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, INGR is a better buy in the long-term than LW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INGR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INGR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both INGR and LW are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

INGR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.89% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -4.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +11.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

INGR is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

LW is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+11.17% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than INGR($7.69B). LW has higher P/E ratio than INGR: LW (13.62) vs INGR (12.21). INGR YTD gains are higher at: -1.486 vs. LW (-25.709). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. INGR (1.17B). INGR has less debt than LW: INGR (2.4B) vs LW (3.63B). INGR has higher revenues than LW: INGR (8.16B) vs LW (6.35B).
INGRLWINGR / LW
Capitalization7.69B15.4B50%
EBITDA1.17B1.34B87%
Gain YTD-1.486-25.7096%
P/E Ratio12.2113.6290%
Revenue8.16B6.35B129%
Total Cash409MN/A-
Total Debt2.4B3.63B66%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INGR vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
INGR
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8474
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19100
SMR RATING
1..100
5342
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5664
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3110
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (34) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as INGR (40) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to INGR’s over the last 12 months.

INGR's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as INGR (53) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to INGR’s over the last 12 months.

INGR's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as LW (64) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as INGR (31) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to INGR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGRLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TXUG25.750.19
+0.74%
Thornburg International Growth ETF
RTH237.870.51
+0.22%
VanEck Retail ETF
BUFQ33.560.01
+0.03%
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF
DYTA28.04-0.01
-0.05%
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF
RORO15.65-0.09
-0.56%
ATAC US Rotation ETF

INGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INGR has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INGR jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INGR
1D Price
Change %
INGR100%
-1.04%
FLO - INGR
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
POST - INGR
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
MKC - INGR
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
GIS - INGR
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
KHC - INGR
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and POST have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and POST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
-2.95%
POST - LW
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
JJSF - LW
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.01%
INGR - LW
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
KHC - LW
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
BYND - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More