ING
Price
$26.20
Change
-$0.31 (-1.17%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
76.68B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SVNLY
Price
$6.78
Change
+$0.11 (+1.65%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
26.77B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ING vs SVNLY

Header iconING vs SVNLY Comparison
Open Charts ING vs SVNLYBanner chart's image
ING Groep
Price$26.20
Change-$0.31 (-1.17%)
Volume$8.09K
Capitalization76.68B
Svenska Handelsbanken AB PUBL
Price$6.78
Change+$0.11 (+1.65%)
Volume$70.13K
Capitalization26.77B
ING vs SVNLY Comparison Chart in %
ING
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVNLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ING vs. SVNLY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ING is a Buy and SVNLY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ING: $26.51 vs. SVNLY: $6.78)
Brand notoriety: ING and SVNLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ING: 52% vs. SVNLY: 35%
Market capitalization -- ING: $77.35B vs. SVNLY: $27.26B
ING [@Major Banks] is valued at $77.35B. SVNLY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $27.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $842.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $142.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ING’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSVNLY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ING’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SVNLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ING and SVNLY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ING’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVNLY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ING’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SVNLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVNLY is a better buy in the short-term than ING.

Price Growth

ING (@Major Banks) experienced а +4.21% price change this week, while SVNLY (@Major Banks) price change was +4.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

ING is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

SVNLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.91% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ING($76.7B) has a higher market cap than SVNLY($26.8B). ING has higher P/E ratio than SVNLY: ING (11.47) vs SVNLY (10.18). ING YTD gains are higher at: 80.929 vs. SVNLY (71.178). ING has less debt than SVNLY: ING (168B) vs SVNLY (1.57T). SVNLY has higher revenues than ING: SVNLY (60.1B) vs ING (22.6B).
INGSVNLYING / SVNLY
Capitalization76.7B26.8B286%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD80.92971.178114%
P/E Ratio11.4710.18113%
Revenue22.6B60.1B38%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt168B1.57T11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ING vs SVNLY: Fundamental Ratings
ING
SVNLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1827
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
519
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1119
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ING's Valuation (67) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SVNLY (97) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SVNLY (19) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLY's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (4) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SVNLY’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SVNLY (46) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ING's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SVNLY (19) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGSVNLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ING
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVNLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQP181.79N/A
N/A
Tradr 2X Long Innovation100 QuarterlyETF
KSTR18.71-0.24
-1.27%
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 ETF
PYR.X0.752419-0.014512
-1.89%
Vulcan Forged (PYR) cryptocurrency
ENJ.X0.041034-0.001093
-2.59%
Enjin Coin cryptocurrency
GALA.X0.009611-0.000282
-2.85%
Gala cryptocurrency

ING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ING has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ING jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ING
1D Price
Change %
ING100%
+0.72%
SAN - ING
72%
Closely correlated
+2.41%
BBVA - ING
68%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
HSBC - ING
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
BCS - ING
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
AAVMY - ING
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
More

SVNLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVNLY has been loosely correlated with SVNLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVNLY jumps, then SVNLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVNLY
1D Price
Change %
SVNLY100%
+1.60%
SVNLF - SVNLY
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.49%
RY - SVNLY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
ING - SVNLY
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
NABZY - SVNLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
SCBFY - SVNLY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
More