ING
Price
$24.14
Change
-$0.30 (-1.23%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
70.9B
80 days until earnings call
SCBFY
Price
$37.71
Change
+$0.41 (+1.10%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
43.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ING vs SCBFY

Header iconING vs SCBFY Comparison
Open Charts ING vs SCBFYBanner chart's image
ING Groep
Price$24.14
Change-$0.30 (-1.23%)
Volume$3.92K
Capitalization70.9B
Standard Chartered
Price$37.71
Change+$0.41 (+1.10%)
Volume$74.67K
Capitalization43.14B
ING vs SCBFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ING vs. SCBFY commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ING is a Buy and SCBFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (ING: $24.44 vs. SCBFY: $37.71)
Brand notoriety: ING and SCBFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ING: 91% vs. SCBFY: 162%
Market capitalization -- ING: $71.59B vs. SCBFY: $43.34B
ING [@Major Banks] is valued at $71.59B. SCBFY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $43.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $796.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ING’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ING’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFY is a better buy in the long-term than ING.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ING’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ING’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ING is a better buy in the short-term than SCBFY.

Price Growth

ING (@Major Banks) experienced а +7.62% price change this week, while SCBFY (@Major Banks) price change was +3.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

ING is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.69% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ING($70.9B) has a higher market cap than SCBFY($43.1B). ING (10.53) and SCBFY (10.37) have similar P/E ratio . ING YTD gains are higher at: 64.037 vs. SCBFY (53.945). SCBFY has less debt than ING: SCBFY (99.4B) vs ING (168B). ING has higher revenues than SCBFY: ING (22.6B) vs SCBFY (20.5B).
INGSCBFYING / SCBFY
Capitalization70.9B43.1B165%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD64.03753.945119%
P/E Ratio10.5310.37102%
Revenue22.6B20.5B110%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt168B99.4B169%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ING vs SCBFY: Fundamental Ratings
ING
SCBFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1827
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCBFY's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (78) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SCBFY (9) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

ING's SMR Rating (4) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SCBFY (6) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (40) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

ING's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SCBFY (27) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGSCBFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTSG20.780.32
+1.56%
BrightSpring Health Services
TZUP15.460.09
+0.59%
Thumzup Media Corporation
FNV171.590.13
+0.08%
Franco-Nevada Corp
MNMD9.85-0.14
-1.40%
Mind Medicine (MindMed)
DARE1.92-0.12
-5.88%
Dare Bioscience Inc.

ING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ING has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ING jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ING
1D Price
Change %
ING100%
+2.09%
SAN - ING
75%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
BBVA - ING
72%
Closely correlated
+4.79%
HSBC - ING
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
AAVMY - ING
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
BCS - ING
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
More

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
+1.10%
HSBC - SCBFY
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
BCS - SCBFY
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
ING - SCBFY
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
SAN - SCBFY
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
AAVMY - SCBFY
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
More