ING
Price
$30.91
Change
+$6.87 (+28.58%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
85.19B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MUFG
Price
$18.52
Change
+$3.18 (+20.73%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
199.95B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ING vs MUFG

Header iconING vs MUFG Comparison
Open Charts ING vs MUFGBanner chart's image
ING Groep
Price$30.91
Change+$6.87 (+28.58%)
Volume$5.75M
Capitalization85.19B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$18.52
Change+$3.18 (+20.73%)
Volume$4.02M
Capitalization199.95B
ING vs MUFG Comparison Chart in %
ING
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MUFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ING vs. MUFG commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ING is a StrongBuy and MUFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (ING: $30.35 vs. MUFG: $18.24)
Brand notoriety: ING and MUFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ING: 189% vs. MUFG: 68%
Market capitalization -- ING: $85.19B vs. MUFG: $199.95B
ING [@Major Banks] is valued at $85.19B. MUFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $199.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $830.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $145.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ING’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMUFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ING’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MUFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ING and MUFG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ING’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUFG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ING’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MUFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ING is a better buy in the short-term than MUFG.

Price Growth

ING (@Major Banks) experienced а +4.51% price change this week, while MUFG (@Major Banks) price change was +2.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

ING is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.89% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUFG($200B) has a higher market cap than ING($85.2B). MUFG has higher P/E ratio than ING: MUFG (17.20) vs ING (12.08). MUFG YTD gains are higher at: 15.006 vs. ING (9.964). MUFG has higher revenues than ING: MUFG (6.77T) vs ING (22.6B).
INGMUFGING / MUFG
Capitalization85.2B200B43%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.96415.00666%
P/E Ratio12.0817.2070%
Revenue22.6B6.77T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A37.6T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ING vs MUFG: Fundamental Ratings
ING
MUFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8683
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1520
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ING's Valuation (69) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MUFG (82) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MUFG (9) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ING (4) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MUFG (42) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

ING's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MUFG (20) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGMUFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ING
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MUFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CZA114.650.60
+0.53%
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
XB39.530.05
+0.12%
BondBloxx B Rated USD Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF
VGIT59.63-0.08
-0.13%
Vanguard Intmdt-Term Trs ETF
ARKX31.67-0.32
-1.00%
ARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF
RCTR35.66-0.40
-1.11%
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF

ING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ING has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ING jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ING
1D Price
Change %
ING100%
+3.27%
SAN - ING
72%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
BBVA - ING
68%
Closely correlated
+2.01%
HSBC - ING
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
BCS - ING
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
MUFG - ING
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
More

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+1.05%
SMFG - MUFG
83%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
BCS - MUFG
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
HSBC - MUFG
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
UBS - MUFG
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
WFC - MUFG
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
More