INFT
Price
$13.70
Change
-$0.05 (-0.36%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
42.89M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NACB
Price
$66.00
Change
-$1.00 (-1.49%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
75.9M
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

INFT vs NACB

Header iconINFT vs NACB Comparison
Open Charts INFT vs NACBBanner chart's image
Infinity Ban
Price$13.70
Change-$0.05 (-0.36%)
Volume$270
Capitalization42.89M
NATIONAL CAP BAN
Price$66.00
Change-$1.00 (-1.49%)
Volume$100
Capitalization75.9M
INFT vs NACB Comparison Chart in %
INFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NACB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INFT vs. NACB commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INFT is a Hold and NACB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (INFT: $13.70 vs. NACB: $66.00)
Brand notoriety: INFT and NACB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INFT: 116% vs. NACB: 31%
Market capitalization -- INFT: $42.89M vs. NACB: $75.9M
INFT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $42.89M. NACB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $75.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INFT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNACB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • INFT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NACB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, INFT is a better buy in the long-term than NACB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NACB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NACB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INFT is a better buy in the short-term than NACB.

Price Growth

INFT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while NACB (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

NACB is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.93% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NACB($75.9M) has a higher market cap than INFT($42.9M). NACB has higher P/E ratio than INFT: NACB (11.89) vs INFT (10.62). INFT YTD gains are higher at: -0.380 vs. NACB (-1.492). NACB has higher revenues than INFT: NACB (27.4M) vs INFT (16.2M).
INFTNACBINFT / NACB
Capitalization42.9M75.9M57%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.380-1.49225%
P/E Ratio10.6211.8989%
Revenue16.2M27.4M59%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.98MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INFT vs NACB: Fundamental Ratings
INFT
NACB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9156
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2241
SMR RATING
1..100
5357
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5053
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2281
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7519

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

INFT's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as NACB (50). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to NACB’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as NACB (41). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to NACB’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as NACB (57). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to NACB’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as NACB (53). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to NACB’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NACB (81). This means that INFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NACB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INFTNACB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NACB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETOLF0.980.03
+3.67%
Enterprise Group, Inc.
FCNCB1777.0017.00
+0.97%
First Citizens BancShares, Inc.
INRLF4.82N/A
N/A
Valneva SE
NRCD0.05N/A
N/A
Nashville Records, Inc.
HSHZY8.10-0.68
-7.70%
Hoshizaki Corporation

INFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INFT and FIEB have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INFT and FIEB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INFT
1D Price
Change %
INFT100%
N/A
FIEB - INFT
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSUN - INFT
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
BKUTK - INFT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGFH - INFT
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
SNLC - INFT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NACB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NACB and IBWC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NACB and IBWC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NACB
1D Price
Change %
NACB100%
-1.49%
IBWC - NACB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBH - NACB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTYP - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGBG - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INFT - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More