Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
INFL vs TMAT
INFL vs TMAT Comparison
Open Charts INFL vs TMAT
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Bnfcrs ETF
Price$42.85
Change+$0.21 (+0.49%)
Volume$88.11K
Net Assets1.3B
Main Thematic Innovation ETF
Price$21.62
Change-$0.45 (-2.04%)
Volume$11.02K
Net Assets159.23M
INFL vs TMAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
INFL vs. TMAT commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INFL is a Hold and TMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INFL has more net assets: 1.3B vs. TMAT (159M). INFL has a higher annual dividend yield than TMAT: INFL (12.989) vs TMAT (3.761). INFL was incepted earlier than TMAT: INFL (4 years) vs TMAT (4 years). INFL (0.85) and TMAT (0.85) have comparable expense ratios . TMAT has a higher turnover INFL (17.00) vs INFL (17.00).
| INFL | TMAT | INFL / TMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 12.989 | 3.761 | 345% |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 159M | 815% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.85 | 100% |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 39.00 | 44% |
| Yield | 1.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| INFL | TMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
INFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INFL has been loosely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INFL jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFL | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| WPM - INFL | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| FNV - INFL | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.38% | ||
| TPL - INFL | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| ICE - INFL | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| BG - INFL | 41% Loosely correlated | +5.69% | ||
More | ||||
TMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMAT has been closely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMAT jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMAT | 100% | -2.04% | ||
| HOOD - TMAT | 78% Closely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| NVDA - TMAT | 72% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| ARM - TMAT | 72% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| MRVL - TMAT | 72% Closely correlated | -3.52% | ||
| MU - TMAT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||