Advertisement
INFA vs SNOW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INFA is a Hold and SNOW is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INFA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNOW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- INFA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SNOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SNOW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SNOW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
INFA (@Computer Communications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNOW (@Packaged Software) price change was -11.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.11%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
INFA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
SNOW is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.13% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-1.63% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| INFA | SNOW | INFA / SNOW | |
| Capitalization | 7.64B | 70.5B | 11% |
| EBITDA | 303M | -1.12B | -27% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -6.018 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 842.88 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.66B | 4.39B | 38% |
| Total Cash | 1.3B | 3.35B | 39% |
| Total Debt | 1.86B | 2.69B | 69% |
SNOW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| INFA | SNOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 25 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ODOT | 2.59 | 0.08 | +2.99% |
| Osprey Polkadot Trust | |||
| XBI | 126.82 | 2.97 | +2.40% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P® Biotech ETF | |||
| GCAD | 52.34 | 0.76 | +1.47% |
| Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Dfns ETF | |||
| BLES | 44.89 | 0.28 | +0.63% |
| Inspire Global Hope ETF | |||
| FLRT | 47.35 | 0.04 | +0.07% |
| Pacer Aristotle Pac Ast Fl Rt Hi Inc ETF | |||
INFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INFA has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INFA jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFA | 100% | N/A | ||
| CLSK - INFA | 50% Loosely correlated | +6.29% | ||
| COIN - INFA | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| PDFS - INFA | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| RIOT - INFA | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.34% | ||
| SNOW - INFA | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
More | ||||
SNOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNOW has been closely correlated with MDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNOW jumps, then MDB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNOW | 100% | -1.54% | ||
| MDB - SNOW | 67% Closely correlated | -5.91% | ||
| COIN - SNOW | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| NET - SNOW | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| CLSK - SNOW | 61% Loosely correlated | +6.29% | ||
| ESTC - SNOW | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.82% | ||
More | ||||