It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INFA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePANW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INFA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PANW’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
INFA (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.37% price change this week, while PANW (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.50%.
INFA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
PANW is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
INFA | PANW | INFA / PANW | |
Capitalization | 10.4B | 90.2B | 12% |
EBITDA | 241M | 1.15B | 21% |
Gain YTD | -5.168 | 11.711 | -44% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 43.23 | - |
Revenue | 1.6B | 7.53B | 21% |
Total Cash | 992M | 3.37B | 29% |
Total Debt | 1.89B | 2.18B | 86% |
PANW | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INFA | PANW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago66% | 4 days ago62% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% | 4 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 4 days ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago75% | 18 days ago64% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 4 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago81% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
STXD | 35.71 | 0.18 | +0.50% |
Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF | |||
NRK | 9.38 | 0.01 | +0.11% |
Nuveen New York AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
MQT | 9.38 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
Blackrock Muni Yield Quality Fund II | |||
VWO | 50.84 | -0.14 | -0.27% |
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | |||
SATO | 21.75 | -0.47 | -2.10% |
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Eco ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INFA has been loosely correlated with GDDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INFA jumps, then GDDY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INFA | 100% | N/A | ||
GDDY - INFA | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
PDFS - INFA | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
SNOW - INFA | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
DDOG - INFA | 46% Loosely correlated | +4.06% | ||
PANW - INFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CYBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CYBR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PANW | 100% | +1.05% | ||
CYBR - PANW | 67% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
ZS - PANW | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
ADSK - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
CRWD - PANW | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
S - PANW | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
More |