INFA
Price
$24.79
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.64B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IQAIF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
3.23M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

INFA vs IQAIF

Header iconINFA vs IQAIF Comparison
Open Charts INFA vs IQAIFBanner chart's image
Informatica
Price$24.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.9M
Capitalization7.64B
Imaging Biometrics
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$19.95K
Capitalization3.23M
INFA vs IQAIF Comparison Chart in %
INFA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INFA vs. IQAIF commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INFA is a Buy and IQAIF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (INFA: $24.79 vs. IQAIF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: INFA and IQAIF are both not notable
INFA represents the Computer Communications, while IQAIF is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INFA: 127% vs. IQAIF: 100%
Market capitalization -- INFA: $7.64B vs. IQAIF: $3.23M
INFA [@Computer Communications] is valued at $7.64B. IQAIF’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $3.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.59T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $39.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.06B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INFA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIQAIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • INFA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IQAIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, INFA is a better buy in the long-term than IQAIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INFA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • INFA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

INFA (@Computer Communications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IQAIF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.97%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

INFA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+3.39% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Services to the Health Industry (+1.65% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INFA($7.64B) has a higher market cap than IQAIF($3.23M). IQAIF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. INFA (-4.396). INFA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 303M vs. IQAIF (-70.53K). INFA has more cash in the bank: 1.3B vs. IQAIF (72.4K). INFA has higher revenues than IQAIF: INFA (1.66B) vs IQAIF (700K).
INFAIQAIFINFA / IQAIF
Capitalization7.64B3.23M236,583%
EBITDA303M-70.53K-429,598%
Gain YTD-4.3960.000-
P/E Ratio842.88N/A-
Revenue1.66B700K237,429%
Total Cash1.3B72.4K1,794,199%
Total Debt1.86BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IQAIF: Fundamental Ratings
IQAIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
40
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INFAIQAIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INFA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X92511.336000490.390620
+0.53%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY689.171.60
+0.23%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL278.03-0.75
-0.27%
Apple
TSLA446.89-4.56
-1.01%
Tesla
GME21.86-0.26
-1.18%
GameStop Corp

IQAIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IQAIF and IDGAF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IQAIF and IDGAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IQAIF
1D Price
Change %
IQAIF100%
N/A
IDGAF - IQAIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAPPF - IQAIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+12.68%
HKIT - IQAIF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
RSKD - IQAIF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
DUOL - IQAIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
More