INBS
Price
$1.12
Change
-$0.16 (-12.50%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
10.17M
LDDD
Price
$1.37
Change
-$1.18 (-46.27%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
41.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

INBS vs LDDD

Header iconINBS vs LDDD Comparison
Open Charts INBS vs LDDDBanner chart's image
Intelligent Bio Solutions
Price$1.12
Change-$0.16 (-12.50%)
Volume$885.41K
Capitalization10.17M
LONGDUODUO
Price$1.37
Change-$1.18 (-46.27%)
Volume$3.8K
Capitalization41.12M
INBS vs LDDD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
INBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LDDD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INBS vs. LDDD commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INBS is a Hold and LDDD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (INBS: $1.12 vs. LDDD: $1.37)
Brand notoriety: INBS and LDDD are both not notable
INBS represents the Medical/Nursing Services, while LDDD is part of the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INBS: 412% vs. LDDD: 505%
Market capitalization -- INBS: $10.17M vs. LDDD: $41.12M
INBS [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $10.17M. LDDD’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $41.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $232.44B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.43B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $10.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLDDD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • INBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LDDD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LDDD is a better buy in the long-term than INBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LDDD’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LDDD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INBS is a better buy in the short-term than LDDD.

Price Growth

INBS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -15.15% price change this week, while LDDD (@Medical Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.73%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-1.97% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

@Medical Specialties (+1.53% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDDD($41.1M) has a higher market cap than INBS($10.2M). LDDD has higher P/E ratio than INBS: LDDD (65.24) vs INBS (10.17). INBS YTD gains are higher at: -20.000 vs. LDDD (-74.954). LDDD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.04M vs. INBS (-9.33M). LDDD has more cash in the bank: 1.46M vs. INBS (1.02M). LDDD has less debt than INBS: LDDD (37K) vs INBS (282K). LDDD has higher revenues than INBS: LDDD (4.99M) vs INBS (3.05M).
INBSLDDDINBS / LDDD
Capitalization10.2M41.1M25%
EBITDA-9.33M1.04M-901%
Gain YTD-20.000-74.95427%
P/E Ratio10.1765.2416%
Revenue3.05M4.99M61%
Total Cash1.02M1.46M70%
Total Debt282K37K762%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INBSLDDD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LDDD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIR86.343.68
+4.45%
AAR Corp
TPL954.2828.71
+3.10%
Texas Pacific Land Corp
NEXA5.00N/A
N/A
Nexa Resources SA
DLNG3.61-0.02
-0.55%
Dynagas LNG Parners LP
ORIS0.27-0.03
-10.80%
Oriental Rise Holdings Ltd

INBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INBS and CODX have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INBS and CODX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INBS
1D Price
Change %
INBS100%
-12.50%
CODX - INBS
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
TWST - INBS
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
SMLR - INBS
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.29%
NNOX - INBS
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
ITGR - INBS
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
More

LDDD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LDDD and BDSX have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LDDD and BDSX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LDDD
1D Price
Change %
LDDD100%
N/A
BDSX - LDDD
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.19%
MCRPF - LDDD
22%
Poorly correlated
-11.62%
INBS - LDDD
20%
Poorly correlated
-12.50%
ZJYL - LDDD
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
HSCS - LDDD
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.41%
More