INBC
Price
$11.65
Change
+$0.16 (+1.39%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
87.78M
ITCFY
Price
$14.46
Change
-$2.24 (-13.41%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.57B
Interact to see
Advertisement

INBC vs ITCFY

Header iconINBC vs ITCFY Comparison
Open Charts INBC vs ITCFYBanner chart's image
InBankshares
Price$11.65
Change+$0.16 (+1.39%)
Volume$323
Capitalization87.78M
Investec
Price$14.46
Change-$2.24 (-13.41%)
Volume$232
Capitalization1.57B
INBC vs ITCFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
INBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ITCFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INBC vs. ITCFY commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INBC is a Hold and ITCFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (INBC: $11.65 vs. ITCFY: $14.46)
Brand notoriety: INBC and ITCFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INBC: 30% vs. ITCFY: 116%
Market capitalization -- INBC: $87.78M vs. ITCFY: $1.57B
INBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $87.78M. ITCFY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileITCFY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • INBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ITCFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ITCFY is a better buy in the long-term than INBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ITCFY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ITCFY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INBC is a better buy in the short-term than ITCFY.

Price Growth

INBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.95% price change this week, while ITCFY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ITCFY($1.57B) has a higher market cap than INBC($87.8M). INBC has higher P/E ratio than ITCFY: INBC (7.30) vs ITCFY (5.69). INBC YTD gains are higher at: 31.787 vs. ITCFY (-11.296). INBC has less debt than ITCFY: INBC (115M) vs ITCFY (20.1B). ITCFY has higher revenues than INBC: ITCFY (19.1B) vs INBC (53.2M).
INBCITCFYINBC / ITCFY
Capitalization87.8M1.57B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD31.787-11.296-281%
P/E Ratio7.305.69128%
Revenue53.2M19.1B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt115M20.1B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ITCFY: Fundamental Ratings
ITCFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8
SMR RATING
1..100
2
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INBCITCFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ITCFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSXCX27.160.19
+0.70%
abrdn US Small Cap Equity C
DVSMX22.080.14
+0.64%
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Investor
HLSCX24.300.10
+0.41%
Hartford Disciplined Equity HLS IC
APGZX119.080.39
+0.33%
AB Large Cap Growth Z
EIPIX18.89-0.03
-0.16%
EIP Growth and Income I

INBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INBC and KGTFF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INBC and KGTFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INBC
1D Price
Change %
INBC100%
N/A
KGTFF - INBC
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFBW - INBC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MVLY - INBC
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
ERKH - INBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCNB - INBC
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
More

ITCFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ITCFY and SABK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITCFY and SABK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITCFY
1D Price
Change %
ITCFY100%
N/A
SABK - ITCFY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
MBOF - ITCFY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
JFBC - ITCFY
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
INBC - ITCFY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JBTC - ITCFY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More