INBC
Price
$7.84
Change
+$0.07 (+0.90%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
ITCFY
Price
$16.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

INBC vs ITCFY

Header iconINBC vs ITCFY Comparison
Open Charts INBC vs ITCFYBanner chart's image
InBankshares
Price$7.84
Change+$0.07 (+0.90%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
Investec
Price$16.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$154
CapitalizationN/A
INBC vs ITCFY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INBC vs. ITCFY commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INBC is a Hold and ITCFY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (INBC: $7.84 vs. ITCFY: $16.70)
Brand notoriety: INBC and ITCFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INBC: 17% vs. ITCFY: 104%
Market capitalization -- INBC: $87.78M vs. ITCFY: $1.57B
INBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $87.78M. ITCFY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileITCFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • INBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ITCFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ITCFY is a better buy in the long-term than INBC.

Price Growth

INBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.19% price change this week, while ITCFY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ITCFY($1.57B) has a higher market cap than INBC($87.8M). INBC has higher P/E ratio than ITCFY: INBC (7.30) vs ITCFY (5.69). ITCFY YTD gains are higher at: 47.599 vs. INBC (-1.975). INBC has less debt than ITCFY: INBC (115M) vs ITCFY (20.1B). ITCFY has higher revenues than INBC: ITCFY (19.1B) vs INBC (53.2M).
INBCITCFYINBC / ITCFY
Capitalization87.8M1.57B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.97547.599-4%
P/E Ratio7.305.69128%
Revenue53.2M19.1B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt115M20.1B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ITCFY: Fundamental Ratings
ITCFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
4
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

INBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INBC and KGTFF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INBC and KGTFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INBC
1D Price
Change %
INBC100%
+0.93%
KGTFF - INBC
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFBW - INBC
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
MVLY - INBC
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
ERKH - INBC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
CCNB - INBC
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
More

ITCFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITCFY has been loosely correlated with FFNW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ITCFY jumps, then FFNW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITCFY
1D Price
Change %
ITCFY100%
N/A
FFNW - ITCFY
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
SABK - ITCFY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
MBOF - ITCFY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFBC - ITCFY
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
INBC - ITCFY
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
More