It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IMYSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTGAFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IMYSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGAFF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).
IMYSF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TGAFF (@Electronics Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.16%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was +1.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.
Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
@Electronics Distributors (+1.56% weekly)Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.
IMYSF | TGAFF | IMYSF / TGAFF | |
Capitalization | 2.16B | 263M | 821% |
EBITDA | 340M | 81.4M | 418% |
Gain YTD | 18.557 | -63.899 | -29% |
P/E Ratio | 51.26 | 3.27 | 1,565% |
Revenue | 3.61B | 1.64B | 220% |
Total Cash | 640M | 119M | 538% |
Total Debt | 1.91B | 96.3M | 1,984% |
IMYSF | TGAFF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 98 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 98 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IMYSF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGAFF (46). This means that IMYSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGAFF’s over the last 12 months.
TGAFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as IMYSF (88). This means that TGAFF’s stock grew similarly to IMYSF’s over the last 12 months.
TGAFF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as IMYSF (94). This means that TGAFF’s stock grew similarly to IMYSF’s over the last 12 months.
IMYSF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGAFF (98). This means that IMYSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGAFF’s over the last 12 months.
TGAFF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as IMYSF (100). This means that TGAFF’s stock grew similarly to IMYSF’s over the last 12 months.
IMYSF | TGAFF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago23% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago33% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago19% | 3 days ago21% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago17% | 3 days ago43% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago16% | 3 days ago33% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago10% | 3 days ago36% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SEEIX | 14.13 | 0.04 | +0.28% |
SEI International Equity I (SIT) | |||
FESGX | 75.03 | 0.11 | +0.15% |
First Eagle Global C | |||
RGGIX | 47.31 | N/A | N/A |
T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock I | |||
LMISX | 26.24 | -0.10 | -0.38% |
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity IS | |||
SPSDX | 18.46 | -0.13 | -0.70% |
Sterling Capital Behav Sm Cp Val Eq C |
A.I.dvisor tells us that IMYSF and SMID have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMYSF and SMID's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMYSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IMYSF | 100% | N/A | ||
SMID - IMYSF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
TGAFF - IMYSF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PSGTY - IMYSF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MCEM - IMYSF | 1% Poorly correlated | +2.82% | ||
LKSGF - IMYSF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TGAFF and IMYSF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TGAFF and IMYSF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TGAFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TGAFF | 100% | N/A | ||
IMYSF - TGAFF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
THYCY - TGAFF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
JHIUF - TGAFF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IBJHF - TGAFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PPCLY - TGAFF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |