IMYSF
Price
$34.01
Change
+$1.55 (+4.78%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.94B
MCEM
Price
$237.05
Change
-$5.46 (-2.25%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
351.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IMYSF vs MCEM

Header iconIMYSF vs MCEM Comparison
Open Charts IMYSF vs MCEMBanner chart's image
IMERYS SA
Price$34.01
Change+$1.55 (+4.78%)
Volume$225
Capitalization2.94B
Monarch Cement Co. (The)
Price$237.05
Change-$5.46 (-2.25%)
Volume$15
Capitalization351.9M
IMYSF vs MCEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IMYSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMYSF vs. MCEM commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMYSF is a Hold and MCEM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (IMYSF: $34.01 vs. MCEM: $237.05)
Brand notoriety: IMYSF and MCEM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMYSF: 111% vs. MCEM: 3%
Market capitalization -- IMYSF: $2.94B vs. MCEM: $351.9M
IMYSF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $2.94B. MCEM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $351.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMYSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCEM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • IMYSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCEM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCEM is a better buy in the long-term than IMYSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMYSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCEM’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IMYSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MCEM’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IMYSF is a better buy in the short-term than MCEM.

Price Growth

IMYSF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCEM (@Construction Materials) price change was -1.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.18% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMYSF($2.94B) has a higher market cap than MCEM($352M). IMYSF YTD gains are higher at: 18.557 vs. MCEM (10.273). IMYSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 544M vs. MCEM (39M). MCEM has less debt than IMYSF: MCEM (2.83M) vs IMYSF (1.88B). IMYSF has higher revenues than MCEM: IMYSF (4.12B) vs MCEM (166M).
IMYSFMCEMIMYSF / MCEM
Capitalization2.94B352M834%
EBITDA544M39M1,395%
Gain YTD18.55710.273181%
P/E Ratio22.88N/A-
Revenue4.12B166M2,483%
Total Cash688MN/A-
Total Debt1.88B2.83M66,549%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMYSF vs MCEM: Fundamental Ratings
IMYSF
MCEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
872
SMR RATING
1..100
934
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5053
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10049
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5045

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IMYSF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as MCEM (15). This means that IMYSF’s stock grew similarly to MCEM’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IMYSF (87). This means that MCEM’s stock grew significantly faster than IMYSF’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IMYSF (93). This means that MCEM’s stock grew significantly faster than IMYSF’s over the last 12 months.

IMYSF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MCEM (53). This means that IMYSF’s stock grew similarly to MCEM’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMYSF (100). This means that MCEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMYSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMYSFMCEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IMYSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCORX18.020.08
+0.45%
Saturna Core
NBSTX52.280.21
+0.40%
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Tr
ERBCX19.290.05
+0.26%
Eaton Vance RBA Equity Strategy Fd Cl C
JAGCX56.450.10
+0.18%
Janus Henderson Glb Tech and Innovt C
MENAX8.960.01
+0.11%
Madison Covered Call & Equity Income A

IMYSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMYSF and SMID have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMYSF and SMID's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMYSF
1D Price
Change %
IMYSF100%
N/A
SMID - IMYSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGAFF - IMYSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSGTY - IMYSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCEM - IMYSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
LKSGF - IMYSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCEM and PPCLY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCEM and PPCLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCEM
1D Price
Change %
MCEM100%
-2.25%
PPCLY - MCEM
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JHIUF - MCEM
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMID - MCEM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMYSF - MCEM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCF - MCEM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More