| IMTM | SCHF | IMTM / SCHF | |
| Gain YTD | 4.482 | 4.201 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 3.7B | 57.5B | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.03 | 1,000% |
| Turnover | 109.00 | 4.00 | 2,725% |
| Yield | 2.31 | 3.41 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| IMTM | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 15 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 77% | about 1 month ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 74% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QDPL | 43.06 | 0.12 | +0.28% |
| Pacer Metaurus US Lg Cp Dvd Mltp 400 ETF | |||
| AAAA | 27.79 | 0.05 | +0.18% |
| Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF | |||
| RMCA | 24.31 | 0.04 | +0.14% |
| Rockefeller California Municipal Bd ETF | |||
| CLOX | 25.55 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Eldridge AAA CLO ETF | |||
| DYTA | 29.48 | -0.03 | -0.08% |
| SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMTM has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMTM jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMTM | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| SAN - IMTM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| MFC - IMTM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| BN - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| STM - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| NWG - IMTM | 66% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHF | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| STM - SCHF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| SAN - SCHF | 75% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| BN - SCHF | 71% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| MFG - SCHF | 70% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| BBVA - SCHF | 68% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
More | ||||