IMRFF
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.01 (+6.25%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.81M
YGTFF
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
34.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IMRFF vs YGTFF

Header iconIMRFF vs YGTFF Comparison
Open Charts IMRFF vs YGTFFBanner chart's image
iMetal Resources
Price$0.17
Change+$0.01 (+6.25%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization1.81M
GOLD TERRA RESOURCE
Price$0.08
Change+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Volume$202.28K
Capitalization34.23M
IMRFF vs YGTFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IMRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YGTFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMRFF vs. YGTFF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMRFF is a Hold and YGTFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (IMRFF: $0.17 vs. YGTFF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: IMRFF and YGTFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMRFF: 37% vs. YGTFF: 108%
Market capitalization -- IMRFF: $1.81M vs. YGTFF: $34.23M
IMRFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.81M. YGTFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $34.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMRFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYGTFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IMRFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YGTFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IMRFF and YGTFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMRFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YGTFF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IMRFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • YGTFF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YGTFF is a better buy in the short-term than IMRFF.

Price Growth

IMRFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -14.47% price change this week, while YGTFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +35.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6013.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.02% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YGTFF($34.2M) has a higher market cap than IMRFF($1.81M). YGTFF YTD gains are higher at: 104.545 vs. IMRFF (-15.423). IMRFF (-1.88M) and YGTFF (-1.94M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . YGTFF has more cash in the bank: 2.19M vs. IMRFF (43.2K). IMRFF (0) and YGTFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
IMRFFYGTFFIMRFF / YGTFF
Capitalization1.81M34.2M5%
EBITDA-1.88M-1.94M97%
Gain YTD-15.423104.545-15%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash43.2K2.19M2%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMRFF vs YGTFF: Fundamental Ratings
IMRFF
YGTFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7927
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4836

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YGTFF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as IMRFF (49). This means that YGTFF’s stock grew similarly to IMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

YGTFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IMRFF (100). This means that YGTFF’s stock grew similarly to IMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

YGTFF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as IMRFF (97). This means that YGTFF’s stock grew similarly to IMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

YGTFF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as IMRFF (42). This means that YGTFF’s stock grew similarly to IMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

YGTFF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IMRFF (100). This means that YGTFF’s stock grew similarly to IMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMRFFYGTFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IMRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YGTFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XNCR11.571.24
+12.00%
Xencor
TDY577.1111.11
+1.96%
Teledyne Technologies
PATK103.601.27
+1.24%
Patrick Industries Inc
CNEY2.46-0.12
-4.65%
CN Energy Group Inc
CPOP0.92-1.13
-55.13%
Pop Culture Group Co Ltd

IMRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMRFF and GLBKF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMRFF and GLBKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMRFF
1D Price
Change %
IMRFF100%
N/A
GLBKF - IMRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HELOF - IMRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIJMY - IMRFF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
YGTFF - IMRFF
10%
Poorly correlated
+20.00%
CGLCF - IMRFF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.84%
More

YGTFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YGTFF and CBGZF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YGTFF and CBGZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YGTFF
1D Price
Change %
YGTFF100%
+20.00%
CBGZF - YGTFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.60%
MAIFF - YGTFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.28%
SSRM - YGTFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
ZIJMF - YGTFF
14%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
AUMBF - YGTFF
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
More