IMRFF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
5.51M
VITFF
Price
$0.35
Change
+$0.02 (+6.06%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
427.15M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IMRFF vs VITFF

Header iconIMRFF vs VITFF Comparison
Open Charts IMRFF vs VITFFBanner chart's image
iMetal Resources
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.51M
Victoria Gold
Price$0.35
Change+$0.02 (+6.06%)
Volume$184.17K
Capitalization427.15M
IMRFF vs VITFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IMRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VITFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMRFF vs. VITFF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMRFF is a Hold and VITFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (IMRFF: $0.10 vs. VITFF: $0.35)
Brand notoriety: IMRFF and VITFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMRFF: 0% vs. VITFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- IMRFF: $5.51M vs. VITFF: $427.15M
IMRFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.51M. VITFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $427.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMRFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVITFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IMRFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VITFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IMRFF and VITFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMRFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VITFF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IMRFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • VITFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IMRFF is a better buy in the short-term than VITFF.

Price Growth

IMRFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VITFF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITFF($427M) has a higher market cap than IMRFF($5.51M). VITFF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. IMRFF (-50.249). VITFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. IMRFF (-2.26M). VITFF has more cash in the bank: 36.1M vs. IMRFF (1.51M). IMRFF has less debt than VITFF: IMRFF (9.92K) vs VITFF (269M). VITFF has higher revenues than IMRFF: VITFF (359M) vs IMRFF (0).
IMRFFVITFFIMRFF / VITFF
Capitalization5.51M427M1%
EBITDA-2.26M124M-2%
Gain YTD-50.2490.000-
P/E RatioN/A25.71-
Revenue0359M-
Total Cash1.51M36.1M4%
Total Debt9.92K269M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMRFF vs VITFF: Fundamental Ratings
IMRFF
VITFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9784
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9278
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VITFF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as IMRFF (45). This means that VITFF’s stock grew similarly to IMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

VITFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IMRFF (100). This means that VITFF’s stock grew similarly to IMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

VITFF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as IMRFF (97). This means that VITFF’s stock grew similarly to IMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

VITFF's Price Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as IMRFF (92). This means that VITFF’s stock grew similarly to IMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

VITFF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IMRFF (100). This means that VITFF’s stock grew similarly to IMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMRFFVITFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IMRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VITFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STEYX15.750.13
+0.83%
AB International Strat Eqs Adv
GCEQX94.870.73
+0.77%
Green Century Equity Individual Investor
BWLAX23.640.08
+0.34%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value A
LADSX22.050.05
+0.23%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R4
PVFIX16.100.01
+0.06%
Pinnacle Value

IMRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMRFF and VITFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMRFF and VITFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMRFF
1D Price
Change %
IMRFF100%
N/A
VITFF - IMRFF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGSSF - IMRFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLBKF - IMRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HELOF - IMRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DYNR - IMRFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.14%
More

VITFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VITFF has been loosely correlated with PMDRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VITFF jumps, then PMDRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VITFF
1D Price
Change %
VITFF100%
N/A
PMDRF - VITFF
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BYAGF - VITFF
57%
Loosely correlated
-4.11%
VTXXF - VITFF
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PAEKY - VITFF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CNL - VITFF
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.76%
More