IMQCF
Price
$5.88
Change
+$0.45 (+8.29%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.94B
LDSCY
Price
$7.69
Change
+$0.25 (+3.36%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.17B
Ad is loading...

IMQCF vs LDSCY

Header iconIMQCF vs LDSCY Comparison
Open Charts IMQCF vs LDSCYBanner chart's image
Inmobiliaria Colonial Socimi SA
Price$5.88
Change+$0.45 (+8.29%)
Volume$2.73K
Capitalization2.94B
Land Securities Group
Price$7.69
Change+$0.25 (+3.36%)
Volume$57.25K
Capitalization6.17B
IMQCF vs LDSCY Comparison Chart
Loading...
LDSCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMQCF vs. LDSCY commentary
Apr 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMQCF is a Hold and LDSCY is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2025
Stock price -- (IMQCF: $5.88 vs. LDSCY: $7.69)
Brand notoriety: IMQCF and LDSCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMQCF: 100% vs. LDSCY: 64%
Market capitalization -- IMQCF: $2.94B vs. LDSCY: $6.17B
IMQCF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.94B. LDSCY’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $6.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMQCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLDSCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IMQCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LDSCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LDSCY is a better buy in the long-term than IMQCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LDSCY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LDSCY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

IMQCF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LDSCY (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +12.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +3.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+3.82% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDSCY($6.17B) has a higher market cap than IMQCF($2.94B). IMQCF has higher P/E ratio than LDSCY: IMQCF (285.71) vs LDSCY (11.74). LDSCY YTD gains are higher at: 0.517 vs. IMQCF (0.000). LDSCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -527M vs. IMQCF (-774.17M). IMQCF has more cash in the bank: 255M vs. LDSCY (42M). LDSCY has less debt than IMQCF: LDSCY (3.54B) vs IMQCF (5.29B). LDSCY has higher revenues than IMQCF: LDSCY (791M) vs IMQCF (378M).
IMQCFLDSCYIMQCF / LDSCY
Capitalization2.94B6.17B48%
EBITDA-774.17M-527M147%
Gain YTD0.0000.517-
P/E Ratio285.7111.742,433%
Revenue378M791M48%
Total Cash255M42M607%
Total Debt5.29B3.54B149%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMQCF vs LDSCY: Fundamental Ratings
IMQCF
LDSCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10057
SMR RATING
1..100
9394
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
148
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LDSCY's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as IMQCF (96). This means that LDSCY’s stock grew similarly to IMQCF’s over the last 12 months.

LDSCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMQCF (100). This means that LDSCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMQCF’s over the last 12 months.

IMQCF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as LDSCY (94). This means that IMQCF’s stock grew similarly to LDSCY’s over the last 12 months.

LDSCY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as IMQCF (50). This means that LDSCY’s stock grew similarly to IMQCF’s over the last 12 months.

IMQCF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LDSCY (48). This means that IMQCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LDSCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LDSCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LDSCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

IMQCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMQCF and LDSCY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMQCF and LDSCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMQCF
1D Price
Change %
IMQCF100%
N/A
LDSCY - IMQCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.36%
BFS - IMQCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
GECFF - IMQCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSEFF - IMQCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INGEF - IMQCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LDSCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LDSCY and IGPYF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LDSCY and IGPYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LDSCY
1D Price
Change %
LDSCY100%
+3.36%
IGPYF - LDSCY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMQCF - LDSCY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKREF - LDSCY
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.43%
LAREF - LDSCY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KREVF - LDSCY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More