IMPUY
Price
$8.64
Change
-$0.50 (-5.47%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.32B
SMAGF
Price
$0.86
Change
-$0.04 (-4.44%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
39.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IMPUY vs SMAGF

Header iconIMPUY vs SMAGF Comparison
Open Charts IMPUY vs SMAGFBanner chart's image
Impala Platinum Holdings
Price$8.64
Change-$0.50 (-5.47%)
Volume$463.42K
Capitalization6.32B
Soma Gold
Price$0.86
Change-$0.04 (-4.44%)
Volume$13.5K
Capitalization39.28M
IMPUY vs SMAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IMPUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMPUY vs. SMAGF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMPUY is a Hold and SMAGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (IMPUY: $8.64 vs. SMAGF: $0.86)
Brand notoriety: IMPUY and SMAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMPUY: 121% vs. SMAGF: 31%
Market capitalization -- IMPUY: $6.32B vs. SMAGF: $39.28M
IMPUY [@Precious Metals] is valued at $6.32B. SMAGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $39.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMPUY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMAGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IMPUY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMAGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMAGF is a better buy in the long-term than IMPUY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMPUY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMAGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IMPUY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMAGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IMPUY and SMAGF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IMPUY (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.87% price change this week, while SMAGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMPUY($6.32B) has a higher market cap than SMAGF($39.3M). SMAGF has higher P/E ratio than IMPUY: SMAGF (625.00) vs IMPUY (3.27). SMAGF YTD gains are higher at: 131.761 vs. IMPUY (83.830). IMPUY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 52.2B vs. SMAGF (16.8M). IMPUY has higher revenues than SMAGF: IMPUY (121B) vs SMAGF (50.3M).
IMPUYSMAGFIMPUY / SMAGF
Capitalization6.32B39.3M16,092%
EBITDA52.2B16.8M310,714%
Gain YTD83.830131.76164%
P/E Ratio3.27625.001%
Revenue121B50.3M240,557%
Total CashN/A680K-
Total DebtN/A29.6M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMPUY vs SMAGF: Fundamental Ratings
IMPUY
SMAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7914
SMR RATING
1..100
9423
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3635
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7892
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IMPUY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMAGF (68). This means that IMPUY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMPUY (79). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMPUY’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IMPUY (94). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew significantly faster than IMPUY’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as IMPUY (36). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew similarly to IMPUY’s over the last 12 months.

IMPUY's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAGF (92). This means that IMPUY’s stock grew similarly to SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMPUYSMAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IMPUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PONGF0.220.03
+18.42%
Atari
VLEEF11.320.47
+4.33%
Valeo SE
ASHTF64.502.50
+4.03%
Ashtead Group PLC
SUCEF26.05N/A
N/A
Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd.
QWTR0.03N/A
N/A
Quest Water Global, Inc.

IMPUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMPUY has been closely correlated with ANGPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMPUY jumps, then ANGPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMPUY
1D Price
Change %
IMPUY100%
-5.47%
ANGPY - IMPUY
76%
Closely correlated
-4.81%
GSVRF - IMPUY
36%
Loosely correlated
-5.68%
KNTNF - IMPUY
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
OCGSF - IMPUY
33%
Loosely correlated
-3.99%
AYASF - IMPUY
33%
Poorly correlated
-5.62%
More

SMAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMAGF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMAGF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMAGF
1D Price
Change %
SMAGF100%
-4.21%
TORXF - SMAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
STLRF - SMAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
PROBF - SMAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.95%
LOMLF - SMAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
IMPUY - SMAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.47%
More