IMPP
Price
$5.93
Change
-$0.21 (-3.42%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
206.63M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MXC
Price
$9.10
Change
-$0.36 (-3.81%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
18.62M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IMPP vs MXC

Header iconIMPP vs MXC Comparison
Open Charts IMPP vs MXCBanner chart's image
Imperial Petroleum
Price$5.93
Change-$0.21 (-3.42%)
Volume$768.4K
Capitalization206.63M
Mexco Energy
Price$9.10
Change-$0.36 (-3.81%)
Volume$12.07K
Capitalization18.62M
IMPP vs MXC Comparison Chart in %
IMPP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MXC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMPP vs. MXC commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMPP is a Buy and MXC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (IMPP: $5.93 vs. MXC: $9.10)
Brand notoriety: IMPP and MXC are both not notable
IMPP represents the Oil & Gas Pipelines, while MXC is part of the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMPP: 142% vs. MXC: 270%
Market capitalization -- IMPP: $206.63M vs. MXC: $18.62M
IMPP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $206.63M. MXC’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $18.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $105.49B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $110.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.2B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMPP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMXC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IMPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MXC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IMPP is a better buy in the long-term than MXC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMPP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MXC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IMPP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MXC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IMPP and MXC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IMPP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +5.70% price change this week, while MXC (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.66%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.81% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

@Oil & Gas Production (+2.01% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMPP($207M) has a higher market cap than MXC($18.6M). MXC has higher P/E ratio than IMPP: MXC (11.52) vs IMPP (5.99). IMPP YTD gains are higher at: 103.987 vs. MXC (-14.854). IMPP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 59.4M vs. MXC (4.56M). IMPP has more cash in the bank: 212M vs. MXC (2.55M). IMPP has less debt than MXC: IMPP (39.9K) vs MXC (114K). IMPP has higher revenues than MXC: IMPP (128M) vs MXC (7.44M).
IMPPMXCIMPP / MXC
Capitalization207M18.6M1,113%
EBITDA59.4M4.56M1,303%
Gain YTD103.987-14.854-700%
P/E Ratio5.9911.5252%
Revenue128M7.44M1,720%
Total Cash212M2.55M8,324%
Total Debt39.9K114K35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MXC: Fundamental Ratings
MXC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMPPMXC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IMPP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MXC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSKIF24.00N/A
N/A
Daiseki Co., Ltd.
HENOF82.71N/A
N/A
Henkel AG & Co. KGAA
LEIC0.15N/A
N/A
Lead Innovation Corporation
BOREF1.90-0.05
-2.56%
Borealis Exploration Limited
FKKFY14.22-0.98
-6.45%
Fukuoka Financial Group, Inc.

IMPP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMPP has been loosely correlated with HUSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMPP jumps, then HUSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMPP
1D Price
Change %
IMPP100%
+0.33%
HUSA - IMPP
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
HPK - IMPP
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
CKX - IMPP
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
USEG - IMPP
37%
Loosely correlated
-7.08%
MXC - IMPP
36%
Loosely correlated
+5.14%
More

MXC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MXC has been loosely correlated with HUSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MXC jumps, then HUSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MXC
1D Price
Change %
MXC100%
+5.14%
HUSA - MXC
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
INDO - MXC
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
USEG - MXC
55%
Loosely correlated
-7.08%
CEIN - MXC
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.73%
BRN - MXC
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
More