IMPP
Price
$3.08
Change
-$0.02 (-0.65%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
80.76M
MARPS
Price
$4.53
Change
+$0.12 (+2.72%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
8.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IMPP vs MARPS

Header iconIMPP vs MARPS Comparison
Open Charts IMPP vs MARPSBanner chart's image
Imperial Petroleum
Price$3.08
Change-$0.02 (-0.65%)
Volume$117.8K
Capitalization80.76M
Marine Petroleum Trust
Price$4.53
Change+$0.12 (+2.72%)
Volume$47.61K
Capitalization8.24M
IMPP vs MARPS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IMPP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MARPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMPP vs. MARPS commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMPP is a Hold and MARPS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (IMPP: $3.08 vs. MARPS: $4.53)
Brand notoriety: IMPP and MARPS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMPP: 47% vs. MARPS: 41%
Market capitalization -- IMPP: $80.76M vs. MARPS: $8.24M
IMPP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $80.76M. MARPS’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $8.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMPP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMARPS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IMPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MARPS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MARPS is a better buy in the long-term than IMPP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMPP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MARPS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IMPP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MARPS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MARPS is a better buy in the short-term than IMPP.

Price Growth

IMPP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -8.61% price change this week, while MARPS (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -13.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.58% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMPP($80.8M) has a higher market cap than MARPS($8.24M). MARPS has higher P/E ratio than IMPP: MARPS (9.51) vs IMPP (1.10). MARPS YTD gains are higher at: 19.637 vs. IMPP (2.326). IMPP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 97.3M vs. MARPS (849K). IMPP has more cash in the bank: 126M vs. MARPS (994K). IMPP has higher revenues than MARPS: IMPP (192M) vs MARPS (1.13M).
IMPPMARPSIMPP / MARPS
Capitalization80.8M8.24M981%
EBITDA97.3M849K11,461%
Gain YTD2.32619.63712%
P/E Ratio1.109.5112%
Revenue192M1.13M17,006%
Total Cash126M994K12,676%
Total Debt15.7KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MARPS: Fundamental Ratings
MARPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMPPMARPS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
88%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IMPP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MARPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRAW1.480.05
+3.50%
Traws Pharma Inc
CWT45.480.01
+0.02%
California Water Service
CLCO6.70-0.04
-0.59%
Cool Company Ltd
BW0.96-0.01
-0.63%
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises
ENPH39.65-1.23
-3.01%
Enphase Energy

IMPP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMPP has been loosely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMPP jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMPP
1D Price
Change %
IMPP100%
-0.65%
FRO - IMPP
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.36%
TK - IMPP
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
LPG - IMPP
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
NVGS - IMPP
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
TRMD - IMPP
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.46%
More

MARPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MARPS and BPT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MARPS and BPT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MARPS
1D Price
Change %
MARPS100%
+2.61%
BPT - MARPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
CMBT - MARPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
IMPP - MARPS
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
NGL - MARPS
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
GLNG - MARPS
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
More