| IMOM | IMTM | IMOM / IMTM | |
| Gain YTD | 10.702 | 6.963 | 154% |
| Net Assets | 136M | 3.76B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.30 | 130% |
| Turnover | 411.00 | 109.00 | 377% |
| Yield | 2.31 | 2.18 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| IMOM | IMTM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IPOCX | 18.37 | 0.22 | +1.21% |
| Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq C | |||
| JDPAX | 16.48 | 0.17 | +1.04% |
| Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value A | |||
| NMMEX | 21.54 | N/A | N/A |
| Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity | |||
| RFISX | 16.22 | -0.16 | -0.98% |
| Ranger Small Cap Institutional | |||
| ILGRX | 38.70 | -1.34 | -3.35% |
| Nomura Large Cap Growth R6 | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMOM has been loosely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMOM jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMOM | 100% | +1.76% | ||
| BBVA - IMOM | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| CRH - IMOM | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| BHP - IMOM | 56% Loosely correlated | +4.83% | ||
| SAP - IMOM | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.80% | ||
| AER - IMOM | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMTM has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMTM jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMTM | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| SAN - IMTM | 72% Closely correlated | -6.36% | ||
| MFC - IMTM | 71% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| BN - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| STM - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| NWG - IMTM | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
More | ||||