Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMOAX vs RLBFX
IMOAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IMOAX vs RLBFX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Mod A
Price$13.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.25
Change-$0.10 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.37B
IMOAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMOAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMOAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. IMOAX (1.13B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IMOAX: RLBFX (2.00) vs IMOAX (1.80). IMOAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IMOAX (24 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). IMOAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IMOAX (17.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IMOAX: RLBFX (250) vs IMOAX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. IMOAX (9.28). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.61 vs. IMOAX (20.30).
| IMOAX | RLBFX | IMOAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 | 372% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 | 372% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.467 | 15.389 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 267B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 2.00 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.28 | 9.94 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.04 | 51.84 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.30 | 45.61 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.60 | 76.42 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement