Advertisement
IMG vs NSLYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMG is a Buy and NSLYF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IMG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNSLYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- IMG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NSLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IMG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- IMG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
IMG (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -30.18% price change this week, while NSLYF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +239.05%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (+1.57% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| IMG | NSLYF | IMG / NSLYF | |
| Capitalization | 10.4M | 6.63B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -7.65M | 888M | -1% |
| Gain YTD | -38.861 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 59.34 | - |
| Revenue | 373K | 6.67B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 2.4K | 12.7M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 437K | 768M | 0% |
IMG | NSLYF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 43 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IMG's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as NSLYF (80). This means that IMG’s stock grew similarly to NSLYF’s over the last 12 months.
IMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NSLYF (100). This means that IMG’s stock grew similarly to NSLYF’s over the last 12 months.
NSLYF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IMG (99). This means that NSLYF’s stock grew significantly faster than IMG’s over the last 12 months.
NSLYF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMG (98). This means that NSLYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMG’s over the last 12 months.
NSLYF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IMG (100). This means that NSLYF’s stock grew significantly faster than IMG’s over the last 12 months.
| IMG | NSLYF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 10% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 11% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
Advertisement
IMG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IMG and JJSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMG and JJSF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMG | 100% | -14.47% | ||
| JJSF - IMG | 25% Poorly correlated | -15.44% | ||
| BRCC - IMG | 24% Poorly correlated | -7.18% | ||
| CLNN - IMG | 14% Poorly correlated | +5.69% | ||
| SJM - IMG | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
| HCWC - IMG | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||
NSLYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NSLYF and QQFSF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSLYF and QQFSF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NSLYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSLYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| QQFSF - NSLYF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SDSYA - NSLYF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TYCMY - NSLYF | 4% Poorly correlated | -5.17% | ||
| OCGPF - NSLYF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IMG - NSLYF | 1% Poorly correlated | -14.47% | ||
More | ||||