Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCG vs VOT
IMCG vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs VOT
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$77.15
Change-$1.09 (-1.39%)
Volume$60.41K
Net Assets2.68B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$270.26
Change-$3.12 (-1.14%)
Volume$163.35K
Net Assets29.66B
IMCG vs VOT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. VOT commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Hold and VOT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 29.7B vs. IMCG (2.68B). VOT has a higher annual dividend yield than IMCG: VOT (6.536) vs IMCG (2.315). IMCG was incepted earlier than VOT: IMCG (21 years) vs VOT (19 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than VOT (0.07). IMCG has a higher turnover VOT (21.00) vs VOT (21.00).
| IMCG | VOT | IMCG / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | 2.315 | 6.536 | 35% |
| Net Assets | 2.68B | 29.7B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.07 | 86% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 21.00 | 205% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 0.65 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 85% | 28 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 82% | 26 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
More | ||||
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| APO - VOT | 80% Closely correlated | -4.34% | ||
| ARES - VOT | 80% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| OWL - VOT | 78% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| TRMB - VOT | 77% Closely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| IR - VOT | 76% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
More | ||||