Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCG vs RFG
IMCG vs RFG Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs RFG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$77.15
Change-$1.09 (-1.39%)
Volume$60.41K
Net Assets2.72B
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF
Price$47.49
Change-$0.73 (-1.51%)
Volume$2.66K
Net Assets287.69M
IMCG vs RFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. RFG commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Hold and RFG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.72B vs. RFG (288M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than RFG: IMCG (2.315) vs RFG (-1.854). IMCG was incepted earlier than RFG: IMCG (21 years) vs RFG (19 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than RFG (0.35). RFG has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| IMCG | RFG | IMCG / RFG | |
| Gain YTD | 2.315 | -1.854 | -125% |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 288M | 943% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.35 | 17% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 89.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 0.31 | 242% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 85% | 19 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
More | ||||
RFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFG has been closely correlated with AIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RFG jumps, then AIT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y