Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCG vs PFUT
IMCG vs PFUT Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs PFUT
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$80.72
Change-$0.11 (-0.14%)
Volume$68.44K
Net Assets2.85B
Putnam Sustainable Future ETF
Price$25.45
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Volume$18.11K
Net Assets370.27M
IMCG vs PFUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. PFUT commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Hold and PFUT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.85B vs. PFUT (370M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than PFUT: IMCG (7.238) vs PFUT (2.791). IMCG was incepted earlier than PFUT: IMCG (21 years) vs PFUT (4 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than PFUT (0.65). PFUT has a higher turnover IMCG (35.00) vs IMCG (35.00).
| IMCG | PFUT | IMCG / PFUT | |
| Gain YTD | 7.238 | 2.791 | 259% |
| Net Assets | 2.85B | 370M | 771% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.65 | 9% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 71.00 | 49% |
| Yield | 0.74 | 0.03 | 2,524% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with DOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then DOV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| DOV - IMCG | 85% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| APO - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| TRMB - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| PNR - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
More | ||||
PFUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFUT has been loosely correlated with PINS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PFUT jumps, then PINS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFUT | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| PINS - PFUT | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| IDXX - PFUT | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| VEEV - PFUT | 19% Poorly correlated | +2.05% | ||
| LULU - PFUT | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
| ECL - PFUT | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
More | ||||