Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCG vs PFUT
IMCG vs PFUT Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs PFUT
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$81.24
Change+$0.58 (+0.72%)
Volume$95.35K
Net Assets3.13B
Putnam Sustainable Future ETF
Price$25.99
Change+$0.08 (+0.31%)
Volume$15.88K
Net Assets394.69M
IMCG vs PFUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. PFUT commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Hold and PFUT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 3.13B vs. PFUT (395M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than PFUT: IMCG (7.321) vs PFUT (4.717). IMCG was incepted earlier than PFUT: IMCG (21 years) vs PFUT (5 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than PFUT (0.65). PFUT has a higher turnover IMCG (35.00) vs IMCG (35.00).
| IMCG | PFUT | IMCG / PFUT | |
| Gain YTD | 7.321 | 4.717 | 155% |
| Net Assets | 3.13B | 395M | 792% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.65 | 9% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 71.00 | 49% |
| Yield | 0.72 | 0.03 | 2,462% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 80% | 17 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with TRMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then TRMB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| TRMB - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| SYF - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| APO - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| PNR - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||
PFUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFUT has been closely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFUT jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFUT | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| TPG - PFUT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| GEV - PFUT | 66% Loosely correlated | +4.28% | ||
| CAVA - PFUT | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.45% | ||
| TOST - PFUT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| GTLB - PFUT | 60% Loosely correlated | +5.59% | ||
More | ||||