47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCG vs OWL
IMCG vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs OWL
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$77.15
Change-$1.09 (-1.39%)
Volume$60.41K
Net Assets2.72B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$18.70
Change-$0.52 (-2.71%)
Volume$5.58M
Capitalization8.65B
IMCG vs OWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. OWL commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Hold and OWL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | OWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IHOAX | 21.08 | -0.26 | -1.22% |
| Hartford International Opportunities A | |||
| ECFGX | 22.66 | -0.30 | -1.31% |
| Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C | |||
| RERCX | 57.17 | -0.78 | -1.35% |
| American Funds EUPAC R3 | |||
| PIDIX | 12.93 | -0.18 | -1.37% |
| Principal International EQ Index Instl | |||
| CTSOX | 38.17 | -0.90 | -2.30% |
| Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth R6 | |||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
More | ||||
OWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y