IMCC
Price
$2.83
Change
+$0.03 (+1.07%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
VRNOF
Price
$1.78
Change
-$0.14 (-7.29%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
139 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

IMCC vs VRNOF

Header iconIMCC vs VRNOF Comparison
Open Charts IMCC vs VRNOFBanner chart's image
IM Cannabis
Price$2.83
Change+$0.03 (+1.07%)
Volume$20.94K
CapitalizationN/A
Verano Holdings
Price$1.78
Change-$0.14 (-7.29%)
Volume$590.11K
CapitalizationN/A
IMCC vs VRNOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
IMCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMCC vs. VRNOF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCC is a Hold and VRNOF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (IMCC: $2.83 vs. VRNOF: $1.78)
Brand notoriety: IMCC and VRNOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMCC: 108% vs. VRNOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- IMCC: $10.21M vs. VRNOF: $1.01B
IMCC [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $10.21M. VRNOF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $1.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMCC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRNOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IMCC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRNOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IMCC is a better buy in the long-term than VRNOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMCC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IMCC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

IMCC (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +45.13% price change this week, while VRNOF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -12.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +56.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

IMCC is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2023.

VRNOF is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+56.20% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRNOF($1.01B) has a higher market cap than IMCC($10.2M). IMCC YTD gains are higher at: 32.120 vs. VRNOF (-60.268). VRNOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 36.4M vs. IMCC (-17.09M). VRNOF has more cash in the bank: 95.1M vs. IMCC (1.3M). IMCC has less debt than VRNOF: IMCC (11.7M) vs VRNOF (502M). VRNOF has higher revenues than IMCC: VRNOF (904M) vs IMCC (52.5M).
IMCCVRNOFIMCC / VRNOF
Capitalization10.2M1.01B1%
EBITDA-17.09M36.4M-47%
Gain YTD32.120-60.268-53%
P/E RatioN/A93.46-
Revenue52.5M904M6%
Total Cash1.3M95.1M1%
Total Debt11.7M502M2%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMCC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IMCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

IMCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMCC and TLRY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMCC and TLRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMCC
1D Price
Change %
IMCC100%
+1.07%
TLRY - IMCC
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.17%
CGC - IMCC
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.08%
ACB - IMCC
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.41%
VRNOF - IMCC
15%
Poorly correlated
-7.29%
BFRI - IMCC
14%
Poorly correlated
-15.38%
More

VRNOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRNOF has been closely correlated with GTBIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VRNOF jumps, then GTBIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRNOF
1D Price
Change %
VRNOF100%
-7.29%
GTBIF - VRNOF
79%
Closely correlated
-4.21%
CURLF - VRNOF
77%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
TCNNF - VRNOF
76%
Closely correlated
-6.28%
TSNDF - VRNOF
73%
Closely correlated
-2.00%
CRLBF - VRNOF
72%
Closely correlated
-2.78%
More