Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCB vs SPMD
IMCB vs SPMD Comparison
Open Charts IMCB vs SPMD
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
Price$83.14
Change+$0.71 (+0.86%)
Volume$400
Net Assets1.37B
State Street SPDR Port S&P 400 Md CpETF
Price$57.99
Change+$0.39 (+0.68%)
Volume$17.91K
Net Assets14.81B
IMCB vs SPMD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCB vs. SPMD commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCB is a Hold and SPMD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPMD has more net assets: 14.8B vs. IMCB (1.37B). IMCB has a higher annual dividend yield than SPMD: IMCB (9.577) vs SPMD (6.479). IMCB was incepted earlier than SPMD: IMCB (21 years) vs SPMD (20 years). SPMD (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than IMCB (0.04). IMCB has a higher turnover SPMD (13.00) vs SPMD (13.00).
| IMCB | SPMD | IMCB / SPMD | |
| Gain YTD | 9.577 | 6.479 | 148% |
| Net Assets | 1.37B | 14.8B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.03 | 133% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 13.00 | 138% |
| Yield | 1.37 | 1.37 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCB | SPMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 75% | 17 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IMCB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCB has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCB jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCB | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| FTV - IMCB | 78% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| CG - IMCB | 78% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ARES - IMCB | 77% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| EQH - IMCB | 76% Closely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| APO - IMCB | 76% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
More | ||||
SPMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPMD has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPMD jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPMD | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| EVR - SPMD | 85% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| BDC - SPMD | 85% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| JHG - SPMD | 85% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| SF - SPMD | 84% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| FLS - SPMD | 84% Closely correlated | -1.28% | ||
More | ||||