Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCB vs SCHM
IMCB vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts IMCB vs SCHM
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
Price$83.96
Change+$0.28 (+0.33%)
Volume$15.34K
Net Assets1.42B
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$30.68
Change+$0.06 (+0.20%)
Volume$408.58K
Net Assets12.55B
IMCB vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCB vs. SCHM commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCB is a Hold and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.5B vs. IMCB (1.42B). SCHM (11.911) and IMCB (11.421) have matching annual dividend yield . IMCB was incepted earlier than SCHM: IMCB (22 years) vs SCHM (15 years). IMCB (0.04) and SCHM (0.04) have comparable expense ratios . IMCB has a higher turnover SCHM (17.00) vs SCHM (17.00).
| IMCB | SCHM | IMCB / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 11.421 | 11.911 | 96% |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 12.5B | 11% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 100% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 17.00 | 106% |
| Yield | 1.37 | 1.41 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCB | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 77% | 10 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IMCB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCB has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCB jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCB | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| FTV - IMCB | 78% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| CG - IMCB | 78% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| ARES - IMCB | 77% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| EQH - IMCB | 76% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| APO - IMCB | 76% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||