ILPMF
Price
$2.33
Change
-$0.23 (-8.98%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
1.37B
NWFL
Price
$26.65
Change
+$0.86 (+3.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
220.68M
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ILPMF vs NWFL

Header iconILPMF vs NWFL Comparison
Open Charts ILPMF vs NWFLBanner chart's image
Permanent TSB Group Holdings
Price$2.33
Change-$0.23 (-8.98%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.37B
Norwood Financial
Price$26.65
Change+$0.86 (+3.33%)
Volume$27.42K
Capitalization220.68M
ILPMF vs NWFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ILPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ILPMF vs. NWFL commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILPMF is a Hold and NWFL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ILPMF: $2.33 vs. NWFL: $26.65)
Brand notoriety: ILPMF and NWFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ILPMF: 1% vs. NWFL: 142%
Market capitalization -- ILPMF: $1.37B vs. NWFL: $220.68M
ILPMF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.37B. NWFL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $220.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ILPMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNWFL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ILPMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NWFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ILPMF is a better buy in the long-term than NWFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ILPMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWFL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ILPMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NWFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWFL is a better buy in the short-term than ILPMF.

Price Growth

ILPMF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.43% price change this week, while NWFL (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

NWFL is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILPMF($1.37B) has a higher market cap than NWFL($221M). NWFL has higher P/E ratio than ILPMF: NWFL (13.77) vs ILPMF (4.96). ILPMF YTD gains are higher at: 29.444 vs. NWFL (0.512). NWFL has less debt than ILPMF: NWFL (144M) vs ILPMF (948M). ILPMF has higher revenues than NWFL: ILPMF (413M) vs NWFL (70.2M).
ILPMFNWFLILPMF / NWFL
Capitalization1.37B221M620%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.4440.5125,746%
P/E Ratio4.9613.7736%
Revenue413M70.2M588%
Total CashN/A30.1M-
Total Debt948M144M658%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ILPMF vs NWFL: Fundamental Ratings
ILPMF
NWFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3561
SMR RATING
1..100
1258
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
981
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ILPMF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NWFL (96) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ILPMF’s stock grew significantly faster than NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

ILPMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as NWFL (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ILPMF’s stock grew similarly to NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

ILPMF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWFL (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ILPMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

ILPMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as NWFL (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ILPMF’s stock grew similarly to NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

NWFL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for ILPMF (98) in the null industry. This means that NWFL’s stock grew significantly faster than ILPMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ILPMFNWFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ILPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNICX32.570.34
+1.05%
Fidelity Advisor New Insights C
PAEEX21.580.12
+0.56%
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R6
FWRLX12.390.06
+0.49%
Fidelity Select Wireless
BAFSX45.830.22
+0.48%
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Inst
LSPAX5.440.01
+0.18%
LoCorr Spectrum Income A

ILPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ILPMF and NWFL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ILPMF and NWFL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ILPMF
1D Price
Change %
ILPMF100%
N/A
NWFL - ILPMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
FRFC - ILPMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.04%
ASRV - ILPMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
ISNPY - ILPMF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
ISDAY - ILPMF
4%
Poorly correlated
+17.66%
More

NWFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWFL has been closely correlated with FDBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWFL jumps, then FDBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWFL
1D Price
Change %
NWFL100%
+3.33%
FDBC - NWFL
70%
Closely correlated
+2.62%
FNLC - NWFL
69%
Closely correlated
+2.42%
PFIS - NWFL
68%
Closely correlated
+2.50%
PKBK - NWFL
67%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
TCBK - NWFL
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
More