ILPMF
Price
$1.64
Change
+$0.04 (+2.50%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.37B
ISNPY
Price
$29.88
Change
+$0.26 (+0.88%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
52.91B
16 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ILPMF vs ISNPY

Header iconILPMF vs ISNPY Comparison
Open Charts ILPMF vs ISNPYBanner chart's image
Permanent TSB Group Holdings
Price$1.64
Change+$0.04 (+2.50%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization1.37B
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A
Price$29.88
Change+$0.26 (+0.88%)
Volume$554.14K
Capitalization52.91B
ILPMF vs ISNPY Comparison Chart
Loading...
ISNPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ILPMF vs. ISNPY commentary
Apr 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILPMF is a Hold and ISNPY is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2025
Stock price -- (ILPMF: $1.64 vs. ISNPY: $29.88)
Brand notoriety: ILPMF and ISNPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ILPMF: 265% vs. ISNPY: 255%
Market capitalization -- ILPMF: $1.37B vs. ISNPY: $52.91B
ILPMF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.37B. ISNPY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $52.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ILPMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileISNPY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ILPMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ISNPY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ISNPY is a better buy in the long-term than ILPMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ISNPY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ISNPY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ILPMF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ISNPY (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

ISNPY is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ISNPY($52.9B) has a higher market cap than ILPMF($1.37B). ISNPY has higher P/E ratio than ILPMF: ISNPY (9.47) vs ILPMF (4.96). ISNPY YTD gains are higher at: 23.727 vs. ILPMF (-8.889). ILPMF has less debt than ISNPY: ILPMF (948M) vs ISNPY (86.7B). ISNPY has higher revenues than ILPMF: ISNPY (23.3B) vs ILPMF (413M).
ILPMFISNPYILPMF / ISNPY
Capitalization1.37B52.9B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.88923.727-37%
P/E Ratio4.969.4752%
Revenue413M23.3B2%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt948M86.7B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ILPMF vs ISNPY: Fundamental Ratings
ILPMF
ISNPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
616
SMR RATING
1..100
123
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9831
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ILPMF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ISNPY (94). This means that ILPMF’s stock grew significantly faster than ISNPY’s over the last 12 months.

ISNPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ILPMF (61). This means that ISNPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ILPMF’s over the last 12 months.

ISNPY's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as ILPMF (12). This means that ISNPY’s stock grew similarly to ILPMF’s over the last 12 months.

ISNPY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as ILPMF (59). This means that ISNPY’s stock grew similarly to ILPMF’s over the last 12 months.

ISNPY's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ILPMF (98). This means that ISNPY’s stock grew significantly faster than ILPMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ISNPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ISNPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

ILPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ILPMF and NWFL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ILPMF and NWFL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ILPMF
1D Price
Change %
ILPMF100%
N/A
NWFL - ILPMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
CCFC - ILPMF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRFC - ILPMF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASRV - ILPMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+8.80%
ISNPY - ILPMF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
More

ISNPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ISNPY has been closely correlated with UNCRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ISNPY jumps, then UNCRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISNPY
1D Price
Change %
ISNPY100%
+0.88%
UNCRY - ISNPY
78%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
SCGLY - ISNPY
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
BNPQY - ISNPY
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
CRZBY - ISNPY
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
EBKDY - ISNPY
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
More