ILMN
Price
$94.57
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Aug 11, 03:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.97B
80 days until earnings call
TLTFF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
40.64M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ILMN vs TLTFF

Header iconILMN vs TLTFF Comparison
Open Charts ILMN vs TLTFFBanner chart's image
Illumina
Price$94.57
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$714
Capitalization14.97B
Theralase Technologies
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$45.6K
Capitalization40.64M
ILMN vs TLTFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ILMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLTFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ILMN vs. TLTFF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILMN is a Hold and TLTFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (ILMN: $94.56 vs. TLTFF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: ILMN: Notable vs. TLTFF: Not notable
ILMN represents the Medical Specialties, while TLTFF is part of the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ILMN: 60% vs. TLTFF: 181%
Market capitalization -- ILMN: $14.97B vs. TLTFF: $40.64M
ILMN [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $14.97B. TLTFF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $40.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $233.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $9.89B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ILMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLTFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ILMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TLTFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ILMN is a better buy in the long-term than TLTFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ILMN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLTFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ILMN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TLTFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TLTFF is a better buy in the short-term than ILMN.

Price Growth

ILMN (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -0.11% price change this week, while TLTFF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +12.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +4.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.45%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

ILMN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+4.25% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.03% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILMN($15B) has a higher market cap than TLTFF($40.6M). TLTFF YTD gains are higher at: -10.663 vs. ILMN (-29.237). ILMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.78B vs. TLTFF (-4.17M). ILMN has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. TLTFF (132K). TLTFF has less debt than ILMN: TLTFF (270K) vs ILMN (2.6B). ILMN has higher revenues than TLTFF: ILMN (4.28B) vs TLTFF (949K).
ILMNTLTFFILMN / TLTFF
Capitalization15B40.6M36,946%
EBITDA1.78B-4.17M-42,793%
Gain YTD-29.237-10.663274%
P/E Ratio11.97N/A-
Revenue4.28B949K451,423%
Total Cash1.16B132K875,000%
Total Debt2.6B270K962,222%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ILMN vs TLTFF: Fundamental Ratings
ILMN
TLTFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
16100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ILMN's Valuation (67) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as TLTFF (70) in the null industry. This means that ILMN’s stock grew similarly to TLTFF’s over the last 12 months.

ILMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as TLTFF (100) in the null industry. This means that ILMN’s stock grew similarly to TLTFF’s over the last 12 months.

ILMN's SMR Rating (16) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for TLTFF (100) in the null industry. This means that ILMN’s stock grew significantly faster than TLTFF’s over the last 12 months.

TLTFF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as ILMN (57) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that TLTFF’s stock grew similarly to ILMN’s over the last 12 months.

ILMN's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLTFF (100) in the null industry. This means that ILMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLTFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ILMNTLTFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ILMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLTFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COWG35.060.11
+0.31%
Pacer US Large Cp CA Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
INVN19.38N/A
N/A
Alger Russell Innovation ETF
RSPR34.75N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Real Estt ETF
HIO3.96-0.02
-0.50%
Western Asset High Income Opportunity Fund
FPRO22.28-0.22
-0.96%
Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF

ILMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILMN has been loosely correlated with A. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ILMN jumps, then A could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ILMN
1D Price
Change %
ILMN100%
-0.98%
A - ILMN
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
BIO - ILMN
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
RVTY - ILMN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
BRKR - ILMN
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.34%
MTD - ILMN
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
More

TLTFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TLTFF and CATX have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLTFF and CATX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLTFF
1D Price
Change %
TLTFF100%
+3.57%
CATX - TLTFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
STRR - TLTFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
ILMN - TLTFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
USAQ - TLTFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-13.30%
TRUMF - TLTFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-7.46%
More