Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ILGCX vs RGACX
ILGCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ILGCX vs RGACX
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Gr A
Price$24.29
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.12M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.23
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
ILGCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ILGCX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILGCX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. ILGCX (218M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ILGCX: RGACX (0.07) vs ILGCX (0.00). ILGCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ILGCX (12 years) vs RGACX (24 years). ILGCX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). ILGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ILGCX: RGACX (250) vs ILGCX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.46 vs. ILGCX (0.79). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 29.83 vs. ILGCX (5.91).
| ILGCX | RGACX | ILGCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.94 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.94 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.050 | 18.558 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.79 | 6.46 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.53 | 60.09 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.91 | 29.83 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.49 | 89.90 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers