Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ILCG vs IWF
ILCG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts ILCG vs IWF
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
Price$92.97
Change+$0.95 (+1.03%)
Volume$43.18K
Net Assets2.6B
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$407.57
Change+$4.01 (+0.99%)
Volume$991.19K
Net Assets106.8B
ILCG vs IWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ILCG vs. IWF commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILCG is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 107B vs. ILCG (2.6B). ILCG has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: ILCG (1.575) vs IWF (-0.701). ILCG was incepted earlier than IWF: ILCG (21 years) vs IWF (25 years). ILCG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IWF (0.19). ILCG has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| ILCG | IWF | ILCG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 1.575 | -0.701 | -225% |
| Net Assets | 2.6B | 107B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.19 | 21% |
| Turnover | 28.00 | 12.00 | 233% |
| Yield | 0.49 | 0.45 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ILCG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 65% | 12 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 70% | 12 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 78% | 12 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 12 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 88% | 21 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 78% | 19 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 88% | 12 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ILCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILCG has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILCG jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILCG | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| META - ILCG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| LRCX - ILCG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| ENTG - ILCG | 78% Closely correlated | -3.07% | ||
| ARES - ILCG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| MSFT - ILCG | 76% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | -10.67% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -9.64% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||