Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ILCG vs IWF
ILCG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts ILCG vs IWF
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
Price$105.56
Change+$0.18 (+0.17%)
Volume$27.87K
Net Assets2.98B
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$480.47
Change+$1.17 (+0.24%)
Volume$752.75K
Net Assets127.51B
ILCG vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ILCG vs. IWF commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILCG is a Buy and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 128B vs. ILCG (2.98B). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than ILCG: IWF (20.001) vs ILCG (18.236). ILCG was incepted earlier than IWF: ILCG (22 years) vs IWF (26 years). ILCG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IWF (0.18). ILCG has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| ILCG | IWF | ILCG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 18.236 | 20.001 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 2.98B | 128B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.18 | 22% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 13.00 | 162% |
| Yield | 0.44 | 0.35 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ILCG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 75% | 12 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ILCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILCG has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILCG jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILCG | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| NVDA - ILCG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| AMZN - ILCG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| ETN - ILCG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| MSFT - ILCG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| PH - ILCG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
More | ||||