Ad is loading...
ILCG vs IWF
ILCG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts ILCG vs IWF
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
Price$90.75
Change-$0.21 (-0.23%)
Volume$1.91K
Net Assets2.5B
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$399.23
Change-$0.39 (-0.10%)
Volume$21.33K
Net Assets105.37B
ILCG vs IWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ILCG vs. IWF commentary
May 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILCG is a Buy and IWF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 105B vs. ILCG (2.5B). ILCG has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: ILCG (1.642) vs IWF (-0.382). ILCG was incepted earlier than IWF: ILCG (21 years) vs IWF (25 years). ILCG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IWF (0.19). ILCG has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| ILCG | IWF | ILCG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 1.642 | -0.382 | -430% |
| Net Assets | 2.5B | 105B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.19 | 21% |
| Turnover | 28.00 | 12.00 | 233% |
| Yield | 0.54 | 0.49 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ILCG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% | 10 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ILCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILCG has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILCG jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILCG | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| META - ILCG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| ENTG - ILCG | 78% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| LRCX - ILCG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| ARES - ILCG | 76% Closely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| AMAT - ILCG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||