Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IJK vs QMOM
IJK vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts IJK vs QMOM
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
Price$94.56
Change-$2.24 (-2.31%)
Volume$687
Net Assets9.12B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$63.36
Change-$2.24 (-3.41%)
Volume$207
Net Assets342.64M
IJK vs QMOM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IJK vs. QMOM commentary
Nov 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IJK is a Hold and QMOM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IJK has more net assets: 9.12B vs. QMOM (343M). IJK has a higher annual dividend yield than QMOM: IJK (6.968) vs QMOM (2.292). IJK was incepted earlier than QMOM: IJK (25 years) vs QMOM (10 years). IJK (0.17) has a lower expense ratio than QMOM (0.29). QMOM has a higher turnover IJK (44.00) vs IJK (44.00).
| IJK | QMOM | IJK / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | 6.968 | 2.292 | 304% |
| Net Assets | 9.12B | 343M | 2,659% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.29 | 59% |
| Turnover | 44.00 | 363.00 | 12% |
| Yield | 0.67 | 1.34 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IJK | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IJK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IJK has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IJK jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| GS - QMOM | 77% Closely correlated | +3.54% | ||
| ARES - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| KKR - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| APO - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| HWM - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | -1.83% | ||
More | ||||