Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IJK vs QMID
IJK vs QMID Comparison
Open Charts IJK vs QMID
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
Price$100.02
Change-$1.73 (-1.70%)
Volume$417
Net Assets9.48B
WisdomTree U.S. Mid Cap Quality Gr
Price$28.68
Change+$0.14 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41M
IJK vs QMID Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IJK vs. QMID commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IJK is a Hold and QMID is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IJK has more net assets: 9.48B vs. QMID (1.41M). IJK has a higher annual dividend yield than QMID: IJK (5.027) vs QMID (1.562). IJK was incepted earlier than QMID: IJK (26 years) vs QMID (2 years). IJK (0.17) has a lower expense ratio than QMID (0.38). QMID has a higher turnover IJK (44.00) vs IJK (44.00).
| IJK | QMID | IJK / QMID | |
| Gain YTD | 5.027 | 1.562 | 322% |
| Net Assets | 9.48B | 1.41M | 671,176% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.38 | 45% |
| Turnover | 44.00 | 50.00 | 88% |
| Yield | 0.64 | 0.51 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IJK | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GVUS | 57.04 | 0.10 | +0.18% |
| Goldman Sachs MktBt Russell LgCpValEqETF | |||
| TRIO | 61.82 | 0.06 | +0.10% |
| MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF | |||
| OCTD | 23.89 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - October | |||
| SLQD | 50.69 | N/A | -0.01% |
| iShares 0-5 Year Invmt Grade Corp Bd ETF | |||
| RXL | 50.99 | -1.11 | -2.14% |
| ProShares Ultra Health Care | |||
IJK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IJK has been closely correlated with BDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IJK jumps, then BDC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
QMID and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMID has been loosely correlated with CSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QMID jumps, then CSW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMID | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMID | 100% | N/A | ||
| CSW - QMID | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| CHDN - QMID | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.41% | ||
| CR - QMID | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.77% | ||
| DBX - QMID | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
| SEIC - QMID | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.14% | ||
More | ||||